Clicky

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR II

Portability
91
Imaging
35
Features
57
Overall
43
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front
 
Ricoh GR II front
Portability
89
Imaging
58
Features
55
Overall
56

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR II Key Specs

Olympus XZ-10
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
  • 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
  • Launched January 2013
Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
  • 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
  • Launched June 2015
  • Previous Model is Ricoh GR
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR II Overview

On this page, we are matching up the Olympus XZ-10 versus Ricoh GR II, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and GR II (16MP) and the XZ-10 (1/2.3") and GR II (APS-C) posses different sensor measurements.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The XZ-10 was unveiled 3 years earlier than the GR II which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple overview of how the XZ-10 grades versus the GR II in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

        

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Ricoh GR II

 XZ-10 GR II 
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Olympus XZ-10

 GR II XZ-10 
LaunchedJune 2015January 2013Newer by 28 months
Display resolution1230k920kClearer display (+310k dot)

Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Ricoh GR II

 XZ-10 GR II 
Focus manually More exact focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurements
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR II Physical Comparison

When you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-10 has external dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR II has proportions of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus XZ-10 versus Ricoh GR II in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the XZ-10 against the GR II.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR II size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-10 and GR II is 91 and 89 respectively.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR II top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR II Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is tough to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions just by researching technical specs. The pic below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-10 and GR II.

As you can tell, both of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-10 using its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Ricoh GR II will provide you with greater detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged XZ-10 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR II sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR II Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Portrait photography advice
Ricoh GR II Portrait photography advice
45
you can focus manually
supports face detect focus
supports RAW formats
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
74
focusing manually
good resolution (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
features face detection focusing
delivers RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Street photography info
Ricoh GR II Street photography info
60
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
heavier than average (221g)
74
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
lighter than competitors (251 grams)
above average high ISO (25,600)
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Sports photography factors
Ricoh GR II Sports photography factors
34
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking focus
low frames per second (5.0 frames/s)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
50
good resolution (16MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
features tracking autofocus
can't change focal length (28mm)
continuous shooting slow (4.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
no phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus XZ-10
Travel photography with Ricoh GR II
60
built-in flash
really wide (26mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than average (221g)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly screen
67
lighter than competitors (251 grams)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
does not have Timelapse function
does not offer selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Landscape photography advice
Ricoh GR II Landscape photography advice
53
you can focus manually
really wide (26mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
decent sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
missing Time Lapse mode
59
focusing manually
screen is a good size (3 inch)
good resolution (16MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
above average high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
does not have Timelapse function
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Vlogging details
Ricoh GR II Vlogging details
35
really wide (26mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does not have selfie friendly screen
missing mic jack
heavier than average (221 grams)
32
features face detection focusing
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors (251 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not offer selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
does not have external microphone socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-10 and Ricoh GR II
 Olympus Stylus XZ-10Ricoh GR II
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus Stylus XZ-10 Ricoh GR II
Type Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Launched 2013-01-30 2015-06-17
Physical type Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - GR Engine V
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.7 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 372.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Max resolution 3968 x 2976 4928 x 3264
Max native ISO 6400 25600
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 35 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-130mm (5.0x) 28mm (1x)
Highest aperture f/1.8-2.7 f/2.8-16.0
Macro focus distance 1cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 3"
Display resolution 920 thousand dots 1,230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30 secs 300 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 5.0 frames per second 4.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 3.00 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 221 gr (0.49 pounds) 251 gr (0.55 pounds)
Physical dimensions 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 80
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.6
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 13.7
DXO Low light score not tested 1078
Other
Battery life 240 pictures 320 pictures
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model Li-50B DB-65
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Retail price $428 $599