Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR II
91 Imaging
35 Features
57 Overall
43
89 Imaging
58 Features
55 Overall
56
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Launched June 2015
- Previous Model is Ricoh GR
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR II Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Olympus XZ-10 versus Ricoh GR II, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and GR II (16MP) and the XZ-10 (1/2.3") and GR II (APS-C) posses different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe XZ-10 was unveiled 3 years earlier than the GR II which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple overview of how the XZ-10 grades versus the GR II in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR II Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 and Ricoh GR II. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery and Ricoh GR II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Ricoh GR II
| XZ-10 | GR II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Olympus XZ-10
| GR II | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2015 | January 2013 | Newer by 28 months | |
| Display resolution | 1230k | 920k | Clearer display (+310k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Ricoh GR II
| XZ-10 | GR II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR II Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-10 has external dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR II has proportions of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus XZ-10 versus Ricoh GR II in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the XZ-10 against the GR II.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-10 and GR II is 91 and 89 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR II Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions just by researching technical specs. The pic below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-10 and GR II.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-10 using its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Ricoh GR II will provide you with greater detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged XZ-10 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR II Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR II Specifications
| Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Ricoh GR II | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Ricoh GR II |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-01-30 | 2015-06-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | GR Engine V |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/2.8-16.0 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 300 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per second | 4.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 221 gr (0.49 pounds) | 251 gr (0.55 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 80 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.7 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 1078 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 pictures | 320 pictures |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-50B | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $428 | $599 |