Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12
91 Imaging
35 Features
57 Overall
43
84 Imaging
52 Features
39 Overall
46
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1/9000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
- Introduced August 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the XZ-10 (12MP) and the GXR Mount A12 (12MP) is relatively well matched but the XZ-10 (1/2.3") and GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) provide different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe XZ-10 was brought out 19 months after the GXR Mount A12 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summation of how the XZ-10 matches up vs the GXR Mount A12 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery and Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12
| XZ-10 | GXR Mount A12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 | August 2011 | Newer by 19 months | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Olympus XZ-10
| GXR Mount A12 | XZ-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12
| XZ-10 | GXR Mount A12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 920k | The same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-10 features physical measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 has sizing of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") having a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs).
Compare the Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the XZ-10 against the GXR Mount A12.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-10 and GXR Mount A12 is 91 and 84 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to picture the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reading through a spec sheet. The pic here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-10 and GXR Mount A12.
As you can see, each of the cameras feature the identical megapixels albeit different sensor dimensions. The XZ-10 features the tinier sensor which should make obtaining shallow DOF harder. The more modern XZ-10 should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2013-01-30 | 2011-08-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 2848 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | () |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/9000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 9.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 221 gr (0.49 pounds) | 370 gr (0.82 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 pictures | 330 pictures |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | DB-90 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (5 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $428 | $349 |