Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung CL5
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
95 Imaging
32 Features
14 Overall
24
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung CL5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
- 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
- Launched February 2009
- Alternate Name is PL10
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung CL5 Overview
Following is a complete analysis of the Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung CL5, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and CL5 (9MP) and the XZ-10 (1/2.3") and CL5 (1/2.5") offer different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe XZ-10 was announced 3 years after the CL5 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL5 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short view of how the XZ-10 scores versus the CL5 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung CL5 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 and Samsung CL5. The whole galleries are available at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery and Samsung CL5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Samsung CL5
| XZ-10 | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 48 months |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL5 over the Olympus XZ-10
| CL5 | XZ-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Samsung CL5
| XZ-10 | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung CL5 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-10 features external measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Samsung CL5 has dimensions of 93mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung CL5 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at that moment. Below is a front view size comparison of the XZ-10 against the CL5.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-10 and CL5 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung CL5 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizes only by looking at specs. The pic below might offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-10 and CL5.
As you can plainly see, both cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The XZ-10 using its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus XZ-10 will give more detail with its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics way more aggressively. The more recent XZ-10 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung CL5 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung CL5 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Samsung CL5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Samsung CL5 |
| Also Known as | - | PL10 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2013-01-30 | 2009-02-23 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 9MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/3.5-4.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 221 grams (0.49 pounds) | 141 grams (0.31 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $428 | $391 |