Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB250F
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
The following is a comprehensive overview of the Olympus XZ-10 versus Samsung WB250F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the XZ-10 (12MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is pretty close and they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe XZ-10 was unveiled very close to the WB250F which means that they are of a similar age. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a short introduction of how the XZ-10 grades versus the WB250F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 & Samsung WB250F. The full galleries are available at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Samsung WB250F
| XZ-10 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Olympus XZ-10
| WB250F | XZ-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Samsung WB250F
| XZ-10 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | January 2013 | Same age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-10 comes with external measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB250F has sizing of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus XZ-10 versus Samsung WB250F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the XZ-10 versus the WB250F.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-10 and WB250F is 91 and 93 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions simply by researching technical specs. The pic underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-10 and WB250F.
As you can tell, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You can expect the Samsung WB250F to render greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Samsung WB250F |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-01-30 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 221g (0.49 pounds) | 226g (0.50 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $428 | $250 |