Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB30F
91 Imaging
35 Features
57 Overall
43
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Released January 2013
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB30F Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB30F, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and WB30F (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe XZ-10 was announced within a month of the WB30F so they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summation of how the XZ-10 grades versus the WB30F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 and Samsung WB30F. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery and Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Samsung WB30F
| XZ-10 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Olympus XZ-10
| WB30F | XZ-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Samsung WB30F
| XZ-10 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 | January 2013 | Similar generation | |
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-10 offers outer measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB30F has specifications of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Compare the Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB30F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the XZ-10 and the WB30F.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-10 and WB30F is 91 and 96 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizing simply by reviewing specs. The graphic here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-10 and WB30F.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should anticipate the Samsung WB30F to offer extra detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics more aggressively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
| Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Samsung WB30F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Samsung WB30F |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2013-01-30 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 221 gr (0.49 lb) | 128 gr (0.28 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $428 | $180 |