Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB850F
91 Imaging
35 Features
57 Overall
43
91 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB850F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
- Released January 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB850F Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Olympus XZ-10 and Samsung WB850F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and WB850F (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe XZ-10 was launched 13 months after the WB850F making them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise summary of how the XZ-10 matches up against the WB850F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB850F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 & Samsung WB850F. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery & Samsung WB850F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Samsung WB850F
| XZ-10 | WB850F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | January 2012 | More modern by 13 months |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 614k | Crisper display (+306k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB850F over the Olympus XZ-10
| WB850F | XZ-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Samsung WB850F
| XZ-10 | WB850F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB850F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-10 provides exterior dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung WB850F has dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") along with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-10 and Samsung WB850F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the XZ-10 against the WB850F.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-10 and WB850F is 91 and 91 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB850F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading technical specs. The image here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-10 and WB850F.
As you can tell, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can anticipate the Samsung WB850F to offer more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The younger XZ-10 provides an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB850F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB850F Specifications
| Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Samsung WB850F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Samsung WB850F |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-01-30 | 2012-01-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | - | AMOLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 221 gr (0.49 pounds) | 250 gr (0.55 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-50B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $428 | $599 |