Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-3N
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
89 Imaging
57 Features
52 Overall
55
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
- Announced February 2013
- Succeeded the Sony NEX-F3
- New Model is Sony a5000
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-3N Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-3N, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and NEX-3N (16MP) and the XZ-10 (1/2.3") and NEX-3N (APS-C) have totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe XZ-10 was brought out within a month of the NEX-3N which means that they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the XZ-10 matches up versus the NEX-3N in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-3N Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 and Sony Alpha NEX-3N. The entire galleries are available at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery and Sony NEX-3N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Sony NEX-3N
XZ-10 | NEX-3N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Olympus XZ-10
NEX-3N | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Sony NEX-3N
XZ-10 | NEX-3N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | February 2013 | Similar generation | |
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-10 has outer dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-3N has specifications of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Check out the Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-3N in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the XZ-10 compared to the NEX-3N.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-10 and NEX-3N is 91 and 89 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing only by going over specs. The visual underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-10 and NEX-3N.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The XZ-10 because of its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field harder and the Sony NEX-3N will deliver extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs more aggressively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2013-01-30 | 2013-02-25 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4912 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 16000 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 920k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per second | 4.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 221 grams (0.49 lbs) | 269 grams (0.59 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 74 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1067 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photographs | 480 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $428 | $399 |