Clicky

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-3N

Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
57
Overall
44
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-3N front
Portability
89
Imaging
58
Features
52
Overall
55

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs

Olympus XZ-10
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
  • 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
  • Launched January 2013
Sony NEX-3N
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
  • Announced February 2013
  • Succeeded the Sony NEX-F3
  • New Model is Sony a5000
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-3N Overview

On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-3N, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and NEX-3N (16MP) and the XZ-10 (1/2.3") and NEX-3N (APS-C) have totally different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The XZ-10 was brought out within a month of the NEX-3N which means that they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the XZ-10 matches up versus the NEX-3N in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Sony NEX-3N

 XZ-10 NEX-3N 
Screen resolution920k460kSharper screen (+460k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Olympus XZ-10

 NEX-3N XZ-10 
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Sony NEX-3N

 XZ-10 NEX-3N 
AnnouncedJanuary 2013February 2013Similar generation
Focus manually Dial precise focusing
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen size
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to carry your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-10 has outer dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-3N has specifications of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).

Check out the Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-3N in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the XZ-10 compared to the NEX-3N.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-3N size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-10 and NEX-3N is 91 and 89 respectively.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-3N top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing only by going over specs. The visual underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-10 and NEX-3N.

As you can plainly see, both of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The XZ-10 because of its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field harder and the Sony NEX-3N will deliver extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs more aggressively.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-3N sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Portrait photography highlights
Sony NEX-3N Portrait photography highlights
45
you can focus manually
includes face detection focusing
supports RAW formats
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
66
has manual focus
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
cannot use external flash
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Street photography info
Sony NEX-3N Street photography info
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
fixed screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
heavier than competition (221 grams)
77
has a tilting screen
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
no image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Sports photography features
Sony NEX-3N Sports photography features
34
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes tracking autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
54
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
better than average battery pack (480 shots)
very slow continuous shooting (4.0 fps)
no image stabilization
has no phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Travel photography details
Sony NEX-3N Travel photography details
60
has built in flash
reasonably wide (26mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition (221 grams)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
71
better than average battery pack (480 CIPA)
good MP (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
doesn't have Timelapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Landscape photography details
Sony NEX-3N Landscape photography details
53
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (26mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of Time Lapse recording
70
has manual focus
switch lenses (Sony E mount)
screen size is good (3")
good MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
better than average battery pack (480 shots)
no image stabilization
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Vlogging details
Sony NEX-3N Vlogging details
35
reasonably wide (26mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of external mic support
heavier than competition (221 grams)
28
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
display is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
doesn't have external microphone port
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-10 and Sony NEX-3N
 Olympus Stylus XZ-10Sony Alpha NEX-3N
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus Stylus XZ-10 Sony Alpha NEX-3N
Category Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2013-01-30 2013-02-25
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - Bionz
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3968 x 2976 4912 x 3264
Max native ISO 6400 16000
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 35 25
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sony E
Lens zoom range 26-130mm (5.0x) -
Largest aperture f/1.8-2.7 -
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Number of lenses - 121
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 920k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 30 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 5.0 frames per second 4.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync - 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) 1920 x 1080
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 221 grams (0.49 lbs) 269 grams (0.59 lbs)
Physical dimensions 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 74
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.8
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.5
DXO Low light rating not tested 1067
Other
Battery life 240 photographs 480 photographs
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID Li-50B NPFW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at release $428 $399