Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K-1
Portability
94 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
94 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
Portability
55 Imaging
75 Features
82 Overall
77
55 Imaging
75 Features
82 Overall
77
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K-1 Key Specs
Olympus TG-310
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2011
Pentax K-1
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 36MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 204800
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 1010g - 137 x 110 x 86mm
- Announced February 2016
- Refreshed by Pentax K-1 II
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K-1 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus TG-310 versus Pentax K-1, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the TG-310 (14MP) and K-1 (36MP) and the TG-310 (1/2.3") and K-1 (Full frame) provide different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe TG-310 was unveiled 6 years earlier than the K-1 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-1 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick overview of how the TG-310 grades against the K-1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K-1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-310 & Pentax K-1. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-310 Gallery & Pentax K-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Pentax K-1
| TG-310 | K-1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax K-1 over the Olympus TG-310
| K-1 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2016 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 62 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display dimensions | 3.2" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 1037k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+807k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Pentax K-1
| TG-310 | K-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K-1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and size. The Olympus TG-310 has got physical dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-1 has specifications of 137mm x 110mm x 86mm (5.4" x 4.3" x 3.4") with a weight of 1010 grams (2.23 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-310 versus Pentax K-1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-310 versus the K-1.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-310 and K-1 is 94 and 55 respectively.
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K-1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizing just by looking at specs. The visual here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-310 and K-1.
All in all, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-310 with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Pentax K-1 will give greater detail having an extra 22MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older TG-310 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-310 Portrait photography details
Pentax K-1 Portrait photography details
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
includes face detect focusing
manual focus not available
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
focusing manually
amazing sensor resolution (36MP)
big sensor size (Full frame)
offers face detection autofocus
exports RAW files
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Street photography with Olympus TG-310
Street photography with Pentax K-1
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
lighter than others in class (155 grams)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
screen articulates
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
big sensor size (Full frame)
exports RAW files
weather proofing
great ISO range (204,800)
heavier than competition in class (1,010 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Olympus TG-310 Sports photography factors
Pentax K-1 Sports photography factors
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
environment sealing
max frames per second very slow (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery power (150 shots)
lack of phase detect AF
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
amazing sensor resolution (36MP)
big sensor size (Full frame)
offers tracking autofocus
weather proofing
has phase detect autofocus
continuous shooting slow (4.4 frames/s)
terrible battery power (760 shots)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-310 as a Travel photography camera
Pentax K-1 as a Travel photography camera
lighter than others in class (155g)
environment sealing
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (28mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
bad battery power (150 per charge)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
weather proofing
amazing sensor resolution (36 megapixels)
terrible battery power (760 shots)
heavier than competition in class (1,010 grams)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-310 as a Landscape photography camera
Pentax K-1 as a Landscape photography camera
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
environment sealing
manual focus not available
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
manual mode not available
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
bad battery power (150 CIPA)
does not have Time Lapse recording
focusing manually
swap lenses (Pentax KAF2 mount)
pretty good screen size (3.2")
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
amazing sensor resolution (36 megapixels)
big sensor size (Full frame)
no anti aliasing filter
great ISO range (204,800)
exports RAW files
weather proofing
2 card slots
terrible battery power (760 per charge)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-310 as a Vlogging camera
Pentax K-1 as a Vlogging camera
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focusing
lighter than others in class (155g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have mic port
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
has external mic support
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
heavier than competition in class (1,010 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K-1 Specifications
| Olympus TG-310 | Pentax K-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus TG-310 | Pentax K-1 |
| Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Launched | 2011-01-06 | 2016-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 861.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 36MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 7360 x 4912 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 204800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 33 |
| Cross focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 151 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3.2" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 4.4 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.20 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto Flash Discharge, Auto Flash + Red-eye Reduction, Flash On, Flash On + Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync + Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, Contrast-control-sync, High-speed sync, Wireless sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/200 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) | 1010 grams (2.23 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 137 x 110 x 86mm (5.4" x 4.3" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 96 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 25.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.6 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 3280 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 images | 760 images |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-42B | D-LI90 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I) |
| Card slots | Single | 2 |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $1,499 |