Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K-500
94 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
64 Imaging
57 Features
70 Overall
62
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K-500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 51600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 646g - 130 x 97 x 71mm
- Launched November 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K-500 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K-500, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the TG-310 (14MP) and the K-500 (16MP) is pretty well matched but the TG-310 (1/2.3") and K-500 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-310 was introduced 3 years before the K-500 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-500 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a simple overview of how the TG-310 matches up versus the K-500 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K-500 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-310 & Pentax K-500. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-310 Gallery & Pentax K-500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Pentax K-500
| TG-310 | K-500 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax K-500 over the Olympus TG-310
| K-500 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | November 2013 | January 2011 | Newer by 35 months | |
| Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Pentax K-500
| TG-310 | K-500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K-500 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus TG-310 comes with physical dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Pentax K-500 has specifications of 130mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") along with a weight of 646 grams (1.42 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K-500 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-310 versus the K-500.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-310 and K-500 is 94 and 64 respectively.
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K-500 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reading through technical specs. The pic here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-310 and K-500.
As you have seen, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The TG-310 having a tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh trickier and the Pentax K-500 will resolve greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged TG-310 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K-500 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K-500 Specifications
| Olympus TG-310 | Pentax K-500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus TG-310 | Pentax K-500 |
| Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Revealed | 2011-01-06 | 2013-11-27 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | PRIME M |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 51600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 151 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD monitor with brightness/color adjustment and AR coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.61x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 6.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.20 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync, Slow Sync+Redeye, Trailing Curtain Sync, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60,50,30,25,24 fps), 640 x 424 (30,25,24 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155g (0.34 pounds) | 646g (1.42 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 130 x 97 x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 79 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.1 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 1087 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 images | 710 images |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | AA |
| Battery model | LI-42B | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $600 |