Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K-500
94 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
64 Imaging
57 Features
70 Overall
62
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K-500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 51600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 646g - 130 x 97 x 71mm
- Launched November 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K-500 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K-500, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the TG-310 (14MP) and the K-500 (16MP) is pretty well matched but the TG-310 (1/2.3") and K-500 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-310 was introduced 3 years before the K-500 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-500 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a simple overview of how the TG-310 matches up versus the K-500 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K-500 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-310 & Pentax K-500. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-310 Gallery & Pentax K-500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Pentax K-500
| TG-310 | K-500 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax K-500 over the Olympus TG-310
| K-500 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | November 2013 | January 2011 | Newer by 35 months | |
| Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Pentax K-500
| TG-310 | K-500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K-500 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus TG-310 comes with physical dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Pentax K-500 has specifications of 130mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") along with a weight of 646 grams (1.42 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K-500 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-310 versus the K-500.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-310 and K-500 is 94 and 64 respectively.
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K-500 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reading through technical specs. The pic here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-310 and K-500.
As you have seen, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The TG-310 having a tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh trickier and the Pentax K-500 will resolve greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged TG-310 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K-500 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K-500 Specifications
| Olympus TG-310 | Pentax K-500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus TG-310 | Pentax K-500 |
| Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Revealed | 2011-01-06 | 2013-11-27 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | PRIME M |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 51600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 151 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD monitor with brightness/color adjustment and AR coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.61x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 6.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.20 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync, Slow Sync+Redeye, Trailing Curtain Sync, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60,50,30,25,24 fps), 640 x 424 (30,25,24 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155g (0.34 pounds) | 646g (1.42 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 130 x 97 x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 79 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.1 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 1087 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 images | 710 images |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | AA |
| Battery model | LI-42B | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $600 |