Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K-500
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
64 Imaging
58 Features
70 Overall
62
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K-500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 51600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 646g - 130 x 97 x 71mm
- Launched November 2013
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K-500 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K-500, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the TG-310 (14MP) and the K-500 (16MP) is pretty well matched but the TG-310 (1/2.3") and K-500 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-310 was introduced 3 years before the K-500 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-500 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a simple overview of how the TG-310 matches up versus the K-500 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K-500 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-310 & Pentax K-500. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-310 Gallery & Pentax K-500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Pentax K-500
TG-310 | K-500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax K-500 over the Olympus TG-310
K-500 | TG-310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | November 2013 | January 2011 | Newer by 35 months | |
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Pentax K-500
TG-310 | K-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K-500 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus TG-310 comes with physical dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Pentax K-500 has specifications of 130mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") along with a weight of 646 grams (1.42 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K-500 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-310 versus the K-500.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-310 and K-500 is 94 and 64 respectively.
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K-500 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reading through technical specs. The pic here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-310 and K-500.
As you have seen, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The TG-310 having a tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh trickier and the Pentax K-500 will resolve greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged TG-310 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K-500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K-500 Specifications
Olympus TG-310 | Pentax K-500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus TG-310 | Pentax K-500 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2011-01-06 | 2013-11-27 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | PRIME M |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4928 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 51600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Cross focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD monitor with brightness/color adjustment and AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.61x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.20 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync, Slow Sync+Redeye, Trailing Curtain Sync, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60,50,30,25,24 fps), 640 x 424 (30,25,24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 155g (0.34 pounds) | 646g (1.42 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 130 x 97 x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.1 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1087 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 images | 710 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | AA |
Battery model | LI-42B | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $0 | $600 |