Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K110D
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
67 Imaging
45 Features
30 Overall
39
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K110D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 585g - 129 x 93 x 70mm
- Released May 2006
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K110D Overview
In this write-up, we are looking at the Olympus TG-310 and Pentax K110D, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the TG-310 (14MP) and K110D (6MP) and the TG-310 (1/2.3") and K110D (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-310 was brought out 4 years after the K110D which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K110D being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the TG-310 matches up versus the K110D in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K110D Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-310 & Pentax K110D. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-310 Gallery & Pentax K110D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Pentax K110D
| TG-310 | K110D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2011 |  | May 2006 | Newer by 57 months |
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 210k | Clearer display (+20k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax K110D over the Olympus TG-310
| K110D | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Pentax K110D
| TG-310 | K110D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K110D Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-310 has got outer measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Pentax K110D has proportions of 129mm x 93mm x 70mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.8") with a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-310 and Pentax K110D in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the TG-310 versus the K110D.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-310 and K110D is 94 and 67 respectively.
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K110D Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing specifications. The picture below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-310 and K110D.
To sum up, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The TG-310 because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Olympus TG-310 will offer you extra detail having its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos far more aggressively. The more modern TG-310 provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K110D Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K110D Specifications
| Olympus TG-310 | Pentax K110D | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus TG-310 | Pentax K110D |
| Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Introduced | 2011-01-06 | 2006-05-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 6 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3008 x 2008 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 200 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 151 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 210 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.20 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155 grams (0.34 lbs) | 585 grams (1.29 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 129 x 93 x 70mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $0 | $1,000 |
