Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K200D
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
61 Imaging
50 Features
41 Overall
46
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K200D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 690g - 134 x 95 x 74mm
- Announced September 2008
- Superseded the Pentax K100D S
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K200D Overview
Here is a in depth analysis of the Olympus TG-310 and Pentax K200D, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Pentax. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the TG-310 (14MP) and K200D (10MP) and the TG-310 (1/2.3") and K200D (APS-C) use totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-310 was introduced 2 years later than the K200D and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K200D being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the TG-310 matches up versus the K200D in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K200D Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-310 and Pentax K200D. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-310 Gallery and Pentax K200D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Pentax K200D
| TG-310 | K200D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 |  | September 2008 | Fresher by 29 months |
Reasons to pick Pentax K200D over the Olympus TG-310
| K200D | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Pentax K200D
| TG-310 | K200D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent display measurement |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K200D Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-310 enjoys exterior measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Pentax K200D has dimensions of 134mm x 95mm x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") and a weight of 690 grams (1.52 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-310 and Pentax K200D in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is the front view size comparison of the TG-310 vs the K200D.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-310 and K200D is 94 and 61 respectively.
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K200D Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to see the gap in sensor sizing simply by researching specs. The graphic below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-310 and K200D.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The TG-310 having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF tougher and the Olympus TG-310 will provide you with more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The newer TG-310 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K200D Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus TG-310 vs Pentax K200D Specifications
| Olympus TG-310 | Pentax K200D | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus TG-310 | Pentax K200D |
| Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Introduced | 2011-01-06 | 2008-09-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 151 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.20 m | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155 gr (0.34 lb) | 690 gr (1.52 lb) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 134 x 95 x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 64 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 561 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 photos | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $0 | $600 |