Olympus TG-310 vs Samsung HZ25W
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
70 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Olympus TG-310 vs Samsung HZ25W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
- Launched July 2010
- Other Name is WB5000
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-310 vs Samsung HZ25W Overview
The following is a in depth review of the Olympus TG-310 vs Samsung HZ25W, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the TG-310 (14MP) and the HZ25W (12MP) is fairly close and they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TG-310 was released 7 months after the HZ25W and they are of a similar generation. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the TG-310 scores vs the HZ25W for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-310 vs Samsung HZ25W Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-310 and Samsung HZ25W. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-310 Gallery and Samsung HZ25W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Samsung HZ25W
| TG-310 | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 |  | July 2010 | Newer by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Olympus TG-310
| HZ25W | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Samsung HZ25W
| TG-310 | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Olympus TG-310 vs Samsung HZ25W Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-310 offers external measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Samsung HZ25W has sizing of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-310 vs Samsung HZ25W in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the TG-310 compared to the HZ25W.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-310 and HZ25W is 94 and 70 respectively.
Olympus TG-310 vs Samsung HZ25W Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions merely by viewing technical specs. The pic underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-310 and HZ25W.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Olympus TG-310 to provide you with more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The newer TG-310 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-310 vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus TG-310 vs Samsung HZ25W Specifications
| Olympus TG-310 | Samsung HZ25W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus TG-310 | Samsung HZ25W |
| Also called as | - | WB5000 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2011-01-06 | 2010-07-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.20 m | 5.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155 gr (0.34 lbs) | 428 gr (0.94 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $350 |
