Olympus TG-310 vs Samsung SL102
Portability
94 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
94 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
Portability
96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
Olympus TG-310 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
Olympus TG-310
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2011
Samsung SL102
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
- Alternate Name is ES55
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Olympus TG-310 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Olympus TG-310 vs Samsung SL102, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the TG-310 (14MP) and SL102 (10MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-310 was announced 2 years after the SL102 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the TG-310 scores vs the SL102 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-310 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-310 & Samsung SL102. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-310 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Samsung SL102
| TG-310 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 25 months |
| Display size | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Olympus TG-310
| SL102 | TG-310 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Samsung SL102
| TG-310 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-310 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera often, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-310 enjoys outside measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Samsung SL102 has measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-310 vs Samsung SL102 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the TG-310 vs the SL102.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-310 and SL102 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-310 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions only by going over a spec sheet. The pic here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-310 and SL102.
Clearly, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-310 to offer greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images way more aggressively. The younger TG-310 provides an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-310 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-310 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung SL102 as a Portrait photography camera
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
features face detection autofocus
manual focus not available
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
features face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
no manual control
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-310 Street photography factors
Samsung SL102 Street photography factors
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
lighter than competition (155g)
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
lighter than competitors (116g)
fixed screen
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Olympus TG-310 Sports photography factors
Samsung SL102 Sports photography factors
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
environment proofing
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (150 CIPA)
lacks phase detect autofocus
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-310 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung SL102 as a Travel photography camera
lighter than competition (155 grams)
environment proofing
resolution is good (14MP)
built-in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse recording
terrible battery pack (150 shots)
does not posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
lighter than competitors (116 grams)
built-in flash
fast maximum aperture (f)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
sensor resolution low (10MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-310 Landscape photography features
Samsung SL102 Landscape photography features
relatively wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
environment proofing
manual focus not available
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
tiny screen (2.7")
no manual mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
terrible battery pack (150 CIPA)
no Time Lapse recording
fast maximum aperture (f)
manual focus not available
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
screen is somewhat small (2.5")
no manual control
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Olympus TG-310
Vlogging with Samsung SL102
relatively wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection autofocus
lighter than competition (155g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
does not posses selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external mic support
fast maximum aperture (f)
features face detect autofocus
lighter than competitors (116g)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have mic socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus TG-310 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Olympus TG-310 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus TG-310 | Samsung SL102 |
| Also Known as | - | ES55 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2011-01-06 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.20 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155 gr (0.34 pounds) | 116 gr (0.26 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $130 |