Olympus TG-310 vs Sigma DP2x
94 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
86 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Olympus TG-310 vs Sigma DP2x Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 320 x 240 video
- 41mm (F) lens
- 280g - 113 x 60 x 56mm
- Revealed February 2011
- Superseded the Sigma DP2s
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-310 vs Sigma DP2x Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Olympus TG-310 and Sigma DP2x, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sigma. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the TG-310 (14MP) and DP2x (5MP) and the TG-310 (1/2.3") and DP2x (APS-C) use totally different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-310 was announced at a similar time to the DP2x and they are of a similar age. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2x being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving in to a complete comparison, below is a quick overview of how the TG-310 scores versus the DP2x with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-310 vs Sigma DP2x Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-310 & Sigma DP2x. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-310 Gallery & Sigma DP2x Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Sigma DP2x
| TG-310 | DP2x | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2x over the Olympus TG-310
| DP2x | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Sigma DP2x
| TG-310 | DP2x | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2011 |  | February 2011 | Same age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-310 vs Sigma DP2x Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-310 features physical dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2x has proportions of 113mm x 60mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") with a weight of 280 grams (0.62 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-310 and Sigma DP2x in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the TG-310 versus the DP2x.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-310 and DP2x is 94 and 86 respectively.
Olympus TG-310 vs Sigma DP2x Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions only by looking through specs. The pic below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-310 and DP2x.
All in all, both the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The TG-310 with its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus TG-310 will provide you with greater detail with its extra 9MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures far more aggressively.
Olympus TG-310 vs Sigma DP2x Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus TG-310 vs Sigma DP2x Specifications
| Olympus TG-310 | Sigma DP2x | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model | Olympus TG-310 | Sigma DP2x |
| Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2011-01-06 | 2011-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | True II |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 5 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 2640 x 1760 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 41mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 15 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.20 m | 4.30 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Forced Flash, Red-Eye Reduction, Slow Synchro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 320 x 240 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 320x240 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155 grams (0.34 lbs) | 280 grams (0.62 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 113 x 60 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 images | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/MMC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $0 | $699 |