Olympus TG-310 vs Sony RX100
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de436/de436c1d22864ee65c1aad5da965732699f4570f" alt="Olympus TG-310 front Olympus TG-310 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a638f/a638fbdfbf56dc62e545c2536c76ceb819a338a9" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 front"
91 Imaging
50 Features
68 Overall
57
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony RX100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 240g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Introduced August 2012
- Replacement is Sony RX100 II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony RX100 Overview
Here is a in-depth analysis of the Olympus TG-310 and Sony RX100, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the TG-310 (14MP) and RX100 (20MP) and the TG-310 (1/2.3") and RX100 (1") offer totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The TG-310 was introduced 20 months prior to the RX100 making them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the TG-310 scores versus the RX100 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony RX100 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-310 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-310 Gallery & Sony RX100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Sony RX100
TG-310 | RX100 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 over the Olympus TG-310
RX100 | TG-310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2012 | ![]() | January 2011 | Fresher by 20 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+999k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Sony RX100
TG-310 | RX100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony RX100 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-310 features exterior dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sony RX100 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") along with a weight of 240 grams (0.53 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-310 and Sony RX100 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-310 against the RX100.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b0ad/4b0ad08ef35bcfc3ced0e8208afd9f16f6cf6f29" alt="Olympus TG-310 vs Sony RX100 size comparison Olympus TG-310 vs Sony RX100 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-310 and RX100 is 94 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/982bb/982bbeeeb8238e3667623529ff5c8e71e0eed5bc" alt="Olympus TG-310 vs Sony RX100 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-310 vs Sony RX100 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony RX100 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing merely by researching a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-310 and RX100.
As you can see, both the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-310 with its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF trickier and the Sony RX100 will render greater detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics more aggressively. The older TG-310 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfbc4/cfbc4ef93380d567941074d3469b5bafc3224363" alt="Olympus TG-310 vs Sony RX100 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-310 vs Sony RX100 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony RX100 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb2a0/fb2a0e969ba9120ad180b556acaa4f68b3679140" alt="Olympus TG-310 vs Sony RX100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-310 vs Sony RX100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus TG-310 vs Sony RX100 Specifications
Olympus TG-310 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus TG-310 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 |
Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2011-01-06 | 2012-08-28 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-100mm (3.6x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/1.8-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | WhiteMagic TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.20 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/2000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 155 gr (0.34 pounds) | 240 gr (0.53 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 390 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 images | 330 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $0 | $448 |