Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic LF1
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
92 Imaging
37 Features
55 Overall
44
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic LF1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 192g - 103 x 62 x 28mm
- Announced November 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic LF1 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Olympus TG-320 and Panasonic LF1, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the LF1 (12MP) is pretty close but the TG-320 (1/2.3") and LF1 (1/1.7") boast different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe TG-320 was launched 22 months before the LF1 which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the TG-320 grades versus the LF1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic LF1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-320 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-320 Gallery and Panasonic LF1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Panasonic LF1
| TG-320 | LF1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic LF1 over the Olympus TG-320
| LF1 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | November 2013 | January 2012 | More modern by 22 months | |
| Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Panasonic LF1
| TG-320 | LF1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither provides Touch screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic LF1 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-320 provides exterior dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Panasonic LF1 has measurements of 103mm x 62mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-320 and Panasonic LF1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the TG-320 and the LF1.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-320 and LF1 is 94 and 92 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic LF1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizes just by looking through technical specs. The picture underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-320 and LF1.
As you can tell, both of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The TG-320 due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Olympus TG-320 will result in more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged TG-320 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic LF1 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic LF1 Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus TG-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2013-11-26 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 23 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | 7.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155 grams (0.34 lb) | 192 grams (0.42 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 103 x 62 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 52 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.6 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 211 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 photographs | 250 photographs |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $500 |