Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZR3
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Portability
94 Imaging
36 Features
26 Overall
32
94 Imaging
36 Features
26 Overall
32
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZR3 Key Specs
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
Panasonic ZR3
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 159g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
- Launched January 2010
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-ZX3
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZR3 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus TG-320 and Panasonic ZR3, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the ZR3 (14MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-320 was revealed 24 months after the ZR3 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the TG-320 matches up versus the ZR3 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZR3 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-320 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Panasonic ZR3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Panasonic ZR3
| TG-320 | ZR3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 24 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR3 over the Olympus TG-320
| ZR3 | TG-320 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Panasonic ZR3
| TG-320 | ZR3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equal screen size |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZR3 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-320 has got exterior measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Panasonic ZR3 has dimensions of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-320 and Panasonic ZR3 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-320 versus the ZR3.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and ZR3 is 94 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZR3 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizes simply by going through technical specs. The pic below will provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-320 and ZR3.
As you can tell, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same MP so you can expect comparable quality of photographs although you have to consider the age of the cameras into account. The newer TG-320 should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZR3 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-320 as a Portrait photography camera
Panasonic ZR3 as a Portrait photography camera
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
has face detection focusing
manual focus not available
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Street photography information
Panasonic ZR3 Street photography information
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
lighter than competitors (155g)
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
has image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Olympus TG-320 as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic ZR3 as a Sports photography camera
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14MP)
has tracking autofocus
weather sealing
slow fps (1.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
not so great battery (150 per charge)
does not have phase detect AF
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
has tracking focus
low max shutter speed (1/1,300s)
continuous shooting slow (2.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Olympus TG-320
Travel photography with Panasonic ZR3
lighter than competitors (155 grams)
weather sealing
MP count decent (14MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
not so great battery (150 per charge)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
megapixel count good (14MP)
has built in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
does not have selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography highlights
Panasonic ZR3 Landscape photography highlights
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
weather sealing
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
not so great battery (150 CIPA)
does not have Time Lapse function
fairly wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
tiny screen (2.7")
no manual control
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
does not have Time Lapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Olympus TG-320
Vlogging with Panasonic ZR3
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focusing
lighter than competitors (155g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external mic support
fairly wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
does not have selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have mic port
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZR3 Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 |
| Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-ZX3 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2010-01-26 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | Venus Engine HD II |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1300 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | 5.30 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD Lite |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155 gr (0.34 lbs) | 159 gr (0.35 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $0 | $280 |