Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-1
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3ced/f3cedb69b934f7169f253825ad9ca28abd57cd22" alt="Olympus TG-320 front Olympus TG-320 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa135/aa1355992173e4aa3e49b43ef3ec8d4d72dcf8b1" alt="Pentax K-1 front Pentax K-1 front"
55 Imaging
75 Features
82 Overall
77
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 36MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 204800
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 1010g - 137 x 110 x 86mm
- Revealed February 2016
- Renewed by Pentax K-1 II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-1 Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Olympus TG-320 versus Pentax K-1, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Olympus and Pentax. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and K-1 (36MP) and the TG-320 (1/2.3") and K-1 (Full frame) enjoy totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The TG-320 was launched 5 years prior to the K-1 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-1 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick summation of how the TG-320 scores versus the K-1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-320 & Pentax K-1. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Pentax K-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Pentax K-1
TG-320 | K-1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax K-1 over the Olympus TG-320
K-1 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2016 | ![]() | January 2012 | More modern by 49 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display sizing | 3.2" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+807k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Pentax K-1
TG-320 | K-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch display |
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-1 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera often, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-320 offers physical dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-1 has measurements of 137mm x 110mm x 86mm (5.4" x 4.3" x 3.4") accompanied by a weight of 1010 grams (2.23 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-320 versus Pentax K-1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the TG-320 vs the K-1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ee23/4ee235a83257a526c0df2213f03b8f122b78f8e2" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-1 size comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-1 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and K-1 is 94 and 55 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b07f5/b07f5a9ec86d002dfd3d9e0aee0b6dfa80c12bd2" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-1 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to see the contrast in sensor sizes just by looking through technical specs. The pic underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-320 and K-1.
As you can tell, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The TG-320 due to its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF harder and the Pentax K-1 will provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 22MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged TG-320 will be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fef47/fef47a56bebede5aa7c1a52f34d6ef4582950fa3" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-1 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77316/7731648761e40c09426670c1ddbe04ac3f77ccb5" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-1 Specifications
Olympus TG-320 | Pentax K-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Pentax K-1 |
Type | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2016-02-17 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 36MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 7360 x 4912 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 204800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 33 |
Cross type focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3.2 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 4.4 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto Flash Discharge, Auto Flash + Red-eye Reduction, Flash On, Flash On + Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync + Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, Contrast-control-sync, High-speed sync, Wireless sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/200s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 155 gr (0.34 lbs) | 1010 gr (2.23 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 137 x 110 x 86mm (5.4" x 4.3" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 96 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 25.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 14.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 3280 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 photos | 760 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I) |
Storage slots | One | Two |
Launch price | $0 | $1,499 |