Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-30
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
63 Imaging
57 Features
66 Overall
60
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 650g - 130 x 97 x 71mm
- Announced October 2012
- Updated by Pentax K-50
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-30 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-30, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the K-30 (16MP) is very close but the TG-320 (1/2.3") and K-30 (APS-C) boast different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-320 was introduced 9 months before the K-30 and they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the TG-320 matches up against the K-30 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-30 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-320 & Pentax K-30. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Pentax K-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Pentax K-30
TG-320 | K-30 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax K-30 over the Olympus TG-320
K-30 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | October 2012 | January 2012 | More recent by 9 months | |
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Pentax K-30
TG-320 | K-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-30 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-320 enjoys exterior dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Pentax K-30 has sizing of 130mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") having a weight of 650 grams (1.43 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-30 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the TG-320 and the K-30.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and K-30 is 94 and 63 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-30 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements simply by looking through specifications. The visual underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-320 and K-30.
To sum up, each of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The TG-320 with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Pentax K-30 will provide you with greater detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The older TG-320 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax K-30 Specifications
Olympus TG-320 | Pentax K-30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus TG-320 | Pentax K-30 |
Category | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2012-01-10 | 2012-10-29 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | Prime M |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4928 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Cross focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD monitor with brightness/color adjustment and AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.61x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye,Slow Sync, Slow Sync+ Redeye, Trailing Curtain Sync, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60,50,30,25,24 fps), 640 x 424 (30,25,24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) | 650 grams (1.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 130 x 97 x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.0 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1129 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 photos | 410 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | D-LI109,4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $0 | $525 |