Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax RZ18
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
92 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax RZ18 Key Specs
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
Pentax RZ18
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 178g - 97 x 61 x 33mm
- Launched September 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax RZ18 Overview
Here, we are matching up the Olympus TG-320 and Pentax RZ18, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the RZ18 (16MP) is very well matched and both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-320 was manufactured 4 months after the RZ18 so they are of a similar age. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the TG-320 matches up versus the RZ18 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax RZ18 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-320 & Pentax Optio RZ18. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Pentax RZ18 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Pentax RZ18
| TG-320 | RZ18 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax RZ18 over the Olympus TG-320
| RZ18 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Pentax RZ18
| TG-320 | RZ18 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | September 2011 | Similar age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax RZ18 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera, you should factor in its weight and size. The Olympus TG-320 comes with outside dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Pentax RZ18 has specifications of 97mm x 61mm x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 178 grams (0.39 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-320 and Pentax RZ18 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the TG-320 vs the RZ18.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and RZ18 is 94 and 92 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax RZ18 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizes purely by checking specs. The pic below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-320 and RZ18.
All in all, both cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Pentax RZ18 to give you more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics way more aggressively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax RZ18 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography highlights
Pentax RZ18 Portrait photography highlights
MP count good (14MP)
has face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
manual focus
resolution is good (16MP)
manual mode not available
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Street photography details
Pentax RZ18 Street photography details
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
lighter than others (155g)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
lighter than competition in class (178 grams)
no moving screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Sports photography highlights
Pentax RZ18 Sports photography highlights
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14MP)
has tracking focus
weather sealing
max frames per second low (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery power (150 CIPA)
does not have phase detect autofocus
amazing zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
weather proofing
low fps (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-320 as a Travel photography camera
Pentax RZ18 as a Travel photography camera
lighter than others (155g)
weather sealing
MP count good (14MP)
flash built-in
quite wide (28mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
bad battery power (150 per charge)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
lighter than competition in class (178g)
weather proofing
resolution is good (16MP)
has built in flash
decently wide (25mm)
great zoom (450mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-320 as a Landscape photography camera
Pentax RZ18 as a Landscape photography camera
quite wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14MP)
weather sealing
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.7")
lack of manual exposure
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
bad battery power (150 CIPA)
does not have Time Lapse mode
manual focus
decently wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
weather proofing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not available
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse function
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Vlogging info
Pentax RZ18 Vlogging info
quite wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect autofocus
lighter than others (155 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have mic port
decently wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (178 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-320 vs Pentax RZ18 Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Pentax Optio RZ18 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus TG-320 | Pentax Optio RZ18 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2011-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 25-450mm (18.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 4cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | 2.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155 gr (0.34 lb) | 178 gr (0.39 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 97 x 61 x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 shots | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-42B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $210 |