Clicky

Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

Portability
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
Olympus TG-320 front
 
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
Portability
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38

Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs

Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Launched January 2012
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Announced March 2010
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview

In this write-up, we are matching up the Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the TG-320 (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") possess different sensor sizing.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The TG-320 was launched 23 months after the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC making the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the TG-320 scores against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 TG-320 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
AnnouncedJanuary 2012March 2010More modern by 23 months
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Olympus TG-320

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC TG-320 
Focus manually  Dial precise focusing
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kClearer display (+690k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 TG-320 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen  Absent selfie screen
Touch display  Absent Touch display
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison

		

		

			
If you are planning to carry around your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-320 provides outside measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the TG-320 versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC size comparison
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 94 and 85 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Generally, it is very difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizes merely by going over specifications. The image below might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-320 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
To sum up, each of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The TG-320 due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh tougher and the Olympus TG-320 will offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The more recent TG-320 provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
	
			Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography features
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Portrait photography features
34
 resolution is good (14MP)
 includes face detection focusing
 no manual focus
 no manual mode
 cannot use external flash
 small sensor (1/2.3")
 has no RAW files
36
 focusing manually
 delivers RAW files
 no liveview feature
 resolution not great (10MP)
 tiny sensor (1/1.7")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Street Comparison
Street photography with Olympus TG-320
Street photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
66
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 environment proof
 lighter than competition (155g)
 no moving screen
 small sensor (1/2.3")
 has no RAW files
65
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 delivers RAW files
 lighter than others (355 grams)
 fixed screen
 tiny sensor (1/1.7")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Sports Comparison
 Olympus TG-320 as a Sports photography camera
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Sports photography camera
41
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 resolution is good (14MP)
 includes tracking autofocus
 environment proof
 low fps (1.0 frames/s)
 lack of shutter priority mode
 small sensor (1/2.3")
 bad battery pack (150 CIPA)
 has no phase detect AF
25
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 no liveview feature
 slow fps (2.0 frames per second)
 resolution not great (10 megapixels)
 tiny sensor (1/1.7")
 has no phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Travel Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Travel photography factors
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Travel photography factors
67
 lighter than competition (155 grams)
 environment proof
 resolution is good (14 megapixels)
 flash built-in
 fairly wide (28mm)
 lack of Time Lapse mode
 bad battery pack (150 shots)
 does not posses selfie friendly display
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
60
 lighter than others (355 grams)
 built-in flash
 decently wide (24mm)
 resolution not great (10 megapixels)
 does not offer selfie friendly display
 slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Landscape Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography features
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography features
39
 fairly wide (28mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 resolution is good (14MP)
 environment proof
 no manual focus
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
 screen is small (2.7")
 no manual mode
 small sensor (1/2.3")
 has no RAW files
 bad battery pack (150 shots)
 lack of Time Lapse mode
47
 focusing manually
 decently wide (24mm)
 screen size is good (3")
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 delivers RAW files
 cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
 slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
 no liveview feature
 resolution not great (10 megapixels)
 tiny sensor (1/1.7")
Photography Glossary
Vlogging Comparison
 Olympus TG-320 as a Vlogging camera
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Vlogging camera
32
 fairly wide (28mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 includes face detection focusing
 lighter than competition (155g)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
 does not posses selfie friendly display
 low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
 lack of external mic support
28
 decently wide (24mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than others (355 grams)
 slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
 does not offer selfie friendly display
 low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
 doesn't have microphone support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	

		

			
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-320 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
 Olympus TG-320Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus TG-320 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Category Waterproof Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2012-01-10 2010-03-18
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III+ Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4288 x 3216 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW format    
Autofocusing
Manual focus    
AF touch    
AF continuous    
Single AF    
AF tracking    
Selective AF    
AF center weighted    
Multi area AF    
AF live view    
Face detect AF    
Contract detect AF    
Phase detect AF    
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-102mm (3.6x) 24-72mm (3.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.5-5.1 f/2.5-4.4
Macro focus distance 3cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7" 3"
Resolution of display 230 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch function    
Display tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs 180 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 1.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual mode    
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash range 5.80 m 4.50 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash    
AEB    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment metering    
Average metering    
Spot metering    
Partial metering    
AF area metering    
Center weighted metering    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone support    
Headphone support    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 155 grams (0.34 lb) 355 grams (0.78 lb)
Dimensions 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 150 pictures 410 pictures
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LI-42B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse feature    
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Retail pricing $0 $349