Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-80
Portability
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
Portability
91 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
91 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2022
- Superseded the Ricoh WG-70
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
Following is a thorough assessment of the Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-80, both Waterproof cameras by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the WG-80 (16MP) is very close and they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-320 was launched 11 years earlier than the WG-80 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the TG-320 matches up vs the WG-80 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-320 & Ricoh WG-80. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Ricoh WG-80
| TG-320 | WG-80 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Olympus TG-320
| WG-80 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2022 |  | January 2012 | More modern by 126 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Ricoh WG-80
| TG-320 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.70" | Identical display size |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-320 provides outer dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-80 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-80 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the TG-320 compared to the WG-80.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and WG-80 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizes only by researching specs. The picture here may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-320 and WG-80.
All in all, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-80 to provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images much more aggressively. The more aged TG-320 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography features
Ricoh WG-80 Portrait photography features
decent MP (14MP)
supports face detect focusing
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (16MP)
comes with face detect focus
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Street photography factors
Ricoh WG-80 Street photography factors
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
lighter than competitors in class (155g)
fixed screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
environment sealing
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Sports photography highlights
Ricoh WG-80 Sports photography highlights
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14MP)
supports tracking focus
weather proofing
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
low battery pack (150 CIPA)
has no phase detect AF
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking focus
environment sealing
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Olympus TG-320
Travel photography with Ricoh WG-80
lighter than competitors in class (155g)
weather proofing
decent MP (14MP)
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
low battery pack (150 shots)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
environment sealing
megapixel count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
really wide (28mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography information
Ricoh WG-80 Landscape photography information
really wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14MP)
weather proofing
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
lack of manual exposure
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
low battery pack (150 shots)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
you can focus manually
really wide (28mm)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
environment sealing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.70 inch)
manual mode not possible
no image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Vlogging factors
Ricoh WG-80 Vlogging factors
really wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect focusing
lighter than competitors in class (155 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have mic port
really wide (28mm)
comes with face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
does not have mic jack
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Ricoh WG-80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus TG-320 | Ricoh WG-80 |
| Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2022-05-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 2.70" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155 gr (0.34 lb) | 193 gr (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 photographs | 300 photographs |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-42B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $300 |
