Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung TL220
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Portability
95 Imaging
34 Features
27 Overall
31
95 Imaging
34 Features
27 Overall
31
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung TL220 Key Specs
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
Samsung TL220
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 169g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Released August 2009
- Also referred to as ST500
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung TL220 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Olympus TG-320 versus Samsung TL220, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the TL220 (12MP) is relatively close and both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-320 was brought out 2 years after the TL220 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the TG-320 scores vs the TL220 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung TL220 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-320 & Samsung TL220. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Samsung TL220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Samsung TL220
| TG-320 | TL220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | August 2009 | More modern by 30 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL220 over the Olympus TG-320
| TL220 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Samsung TL220
| TG-320 | TL220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung TL220 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-320 has got physical dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Samsung TL220 has dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") and a weight of 169 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-320 versus Samsung TL220 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the TG-320 versus the TL220.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-320 and TL220 is 94 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung TL220 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes simply by viewing technical specs. The picture here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-320 and TL220.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can count on the Olympus TG-320 to result in extra detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The newer TG-320 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung TL220 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-320
Portrait photography with Samsung TL220
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
features face detect focus
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Street photography info
Samsung TL220 Street photography info
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
lighter than competition (155 grams)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with touch to focus
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Sports photography factors
Samsung TL220 Sports photography factors
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
features tracking focus
environment proofing
slow fps (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery power (150 shots)
no phase detect auto focus
image stabilization (Optical)
no shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-320 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung TL220 as a Travel photography camera
lighter than competition (155 grams)
environment proofing
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
bad battery power (150 CIPA)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
comes with touch to focus
built-in flash
decently wide (27mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography advice
Samsung TL220 Landscape photography advice
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
environment proofing
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.7")
lack of manual exposure
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
bad battery power (150 CIPA)
lack of Time Lapse recording
decently wide (27mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
no manual mode
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Vlogging factors
Samsung TL220 Vlogging factors
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect focus
lighter than competition (155 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of mic socket
decently wide (27mm)
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Optical)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have mic support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung TL220 Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Samsung TL220 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus TG-320 | Samsung TL220 |
| Alternate name | - | ST500 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2009-08-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155 grams (0.34 lbs) | 169 grams (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-42B | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $0 | $90 |