Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB350F
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Introduced January 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Below is a thorough assessment of the Olympus TG-320 and Samsung WB350F, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is very well matched and they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-320 was announced 24 months earlier than the WB350F making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the TG-320 scores vs the WB350F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-320 and Samsung WB350F. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-320 Gallery and Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Samsung WB350F
| TG-320 | WB350F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Olympus TG-320
| WB350F | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 |  | January 2012 | More recent by 24 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Samsung WB350F
| TG-320 | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera often, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-320 comes with external measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung WB350F has proportions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-320 and Samsung WB350F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the TG-320 versus the WB350F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and WB350F is 94 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to see the difference between sensor measurements simply by checking technical specs. The photograph here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-320 and WB350F.
As you have seen, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Samsung WB350F to resolve more detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics far more aggressively. The older TG-320 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Samsung WB350F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus TG-320 | Samsung WB350F |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-01-10 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155g (0.34 lb) | 276g (0.61 lb) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-42B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $0 | $260 |