Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB50F
Portability
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
Portability
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
Samsung WB50F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Launched January 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB50F, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the WB50F (16MP) is very well matched and both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-320 was announced 24 months prior to the WB50F making them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short highlight of how the TG-320 grades versus the WB50F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-320 and Samsung WB50F. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-320 Gallery and Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Samsung WB50F
| TG-320 | WB50F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Olympus TG-320
| WB50F | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 |  | January 2012 | More recent by 24 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Samsung WB50F
| TG-320 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-320 comes with exterior dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB50F has proportions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB50F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the TG-320 against the WB50F.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-320 and WB50F is 94 and 92 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to imagine the gap between sensor measurements purely by checking technical specs. The graphic underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-320 and WB50F.
As you have seen, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Samsung WB50F to give you more detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The older TG-320 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-320 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB50F as a Portrait photography camera
good megapixels (14MP)
has face detect focusing
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not available
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-320 as a Street photography camera
Samsung WB50F as a Street photography camera
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
lighter than competitors in class (155g)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (207g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Olympus TG-320 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB50F as a Sports photography camera
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
has tracking focus
environment proof
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
not so great battery (150 shots)
lacks phase detect AF
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
no shutter priority
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Travel photography factors
Samsung WB50F Travel photography factors
lighter than competitors in class (155g)
environment proof
good megapixels (14MP)
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
not so great battery (150 per charge)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
lighter than competition in class (207g)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (24mm)
very long reach (288mm)
no Timelapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography advice
Samsung WB50F Landscape photography advice
fairly wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
environment proof
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7")
manual mode not available
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
not so great battery (150 CIPA)
missing Time Lapse recording
you can focus manually
really wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
manual mode not available
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
no Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Olympus TG-320
Vlogging with Samsung WB50F
fairly wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focusing
lighter than competitors in class (155g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing mic port
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (207g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external microphone support
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Samsung WB50F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Samsung WB50F |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) | 207 grams (0.46 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $180 |
