Olympus TG-320 vs Sigma SD10
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Olympus TG-320 vs Sigma SD10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800 (Raise to 1600)
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Released March 2004
- Succeeded the Sigma SD9
- Successor is Sigma SD14
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-320 vs Sigma SD10 Overview
The following is a detailed review of the Olympus TG-320 versus Sigma SD10, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sigma. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and SD10 (3MP) and the TG-320 (1/2.3") and SD10 (APS-C) provide different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-320 was launched 7 years after the SD10 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the TG-320 grades vs the SD10 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-320 vs Sigma SD10 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-320 & Sigma SD10. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Sigma SD10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Sigma SD10
| TG-320 | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | March 2004 | Newer by 96 months |
| Display size | 2.7" |  | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 130k | Sharper display (+100k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD10 over the Olympus TG-320
| SD10 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Sigma SD10
| TG-320 | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Olympus TG-320 vs Sigma SD10 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus TG-320 offers outside measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sigma SD10 has specifications of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") having a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-320 versus Sigma SD10 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at the time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-320 compared to the SD10.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-320 and SD10 is 94 and 54 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sigma SD10 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions only by seeing specifications. The image underneath will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-320 and SD10.
Plainly, the 2 cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The TG-320 due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh more challenging and the Olympus TG-320 will show extra detail utilizing its extra 11 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics way more aggressively. The more recent TG-320 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sigma SD10 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-320 vs Sigma SD10 Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Sigma SD10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Sigma SD10 |
| Type | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2004-03-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 3 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 1.8 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 130 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155 grams (0.34 lb) | 950 grams (2.09 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $0 | $198 |