Clicky

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A99 II

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
33
Overall
35
Olympus TG-320 front
 
Sony Alpha A99 II front
Portability
57
Imaging
77
Features
92
Overall
83

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A99 II Key Specs

Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Launched January 2012
Sony A99 II
(Full Review)
  • 42MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600 (Raise to 102400)
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 849g - 143 x 104 x 76mm
  • Released September 2016
  • Succeeded the Sony A99
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A99 II Overview

The following is a extensive review of the Olympus TG-320 versus Sony A99 II, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and A99 II (42MP) and the TG-320 (1/2.3") and A99 II (Full frame) enjoy different sensor sizes.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The TG-320 was manufactured 5 years prior to the A99 II which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony A99 II being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the TG-320 matches up versus the A99 II with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Sony A99 II

 TG-320 A99 II 

Reasons to pick Sony A99 II over the Olympus TG-320

 A99 II TG-320 
ReleasedSeptember 2016January 2012Newer by 57 months
Focus manually Dial precise focusing
Display typeFully articulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1229k230kCrisper display (+999k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Sony A99 II

 TG-320 A99 II 
Touch display Neither features Touch display

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A99 II Physical Comparison

In case you're going to travel with your camera, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-320 enjoys outer measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sony A99 II has proportions of 143mm x 104mm x 76mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.0") having a weight of 849 grams (1.87 lbs).

Examine the Olympus TG-320 versus Sony A99 II in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the TG-320 against the A99 II.

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A99 II size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and A99 II is 94 and 57 respectively.

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A99 II top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A99 II Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions just by looking at technical specs. The picture below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-320 and A99 II.

As you have seen, both of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The TG-320 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sony A99 II will give you extra detail due to its extra 28MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged TG-320 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A99 II sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A99 II Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A99 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography factors
Sony A99 II Portrait photography factors
33
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
features face detect focus
no manual focus
manual mode not available
no external flash support
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
86
you can focus manually
excellent megapixels (42MP)
great sensor size (Full frame)
includes face detection autofocus
delivers RAW formats
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus TG-320
Street photography with Sony A99 II
66
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
lighter than average in class (155g)
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
76
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
great sensor size (Full frame)
delivers RAW formats
environment proof
good ISO range (25,600)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus TG-320 Sports photography information
Sony A99 II Sports photography information
40
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14MP)
features tracking focus
weather sealing
low fps (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
not so great battery (150 per charge)
has no phase detect auto focus
82
high shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
excellent megapixels (42MP)
great sensor size (Full frame)
includes tracking autofocus
environment proof
supports phase detect autofocus
not so great battery life (490 CIPA)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus TG-320 as a Travel photography camera
Sony A99 II as a Travel photography camera
67
lighter than average in class (155 grams)
weather sealing
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse recording
not so great battery (150 CIPA)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
70
environment proof
supports bluetooth
excellent megapixels (42MP)
selfie friendly display
not so great battery life (490 shots)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus TG-320
Landscape photography with Sony A99 II
39
decently wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
weather sealing
no manual focus
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7")
manual mode not available
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
not so great battery (150 CIPA)
missing Timelapse recording
82
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
excellent megapixels (42MP)
great sensor size (Full frame)
no low pass filter
good ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
environment proof
has dual storage slots
not so great battery life (490 shots)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus TG-320
Vlogging with Sony A99 II
32
decently wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect focus
lighter than average in class (155 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing microphone jack
78
selfie friendly display
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detection autofocus
high quality video (3840 x 2160 resolution)
comes with external mic jack
Photography Glossary

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A99 II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-320 and Sony A99 II
 Olympus TG-320Sony Alpha A99 II
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus TG-320 Sony Alpha A99 II
Type Waterproof Advanced DSLR
Launched 2012-01-10 2016-09-19
Body design Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III+ Bionz X
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Full frame
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 35.9 x 24mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 861.6mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 42 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4288 x 3216 7952 x 5304
Maximum native ISO 1600 25600
Maximum enhanced ISO - 102400
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW pictures
Minimum enhanced ISO - 50
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points - 399
Cross type focus points - 79
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range 28-102mm (3.6x) -
Maximal aperture f/3.5-5.1 -
Macro focusing distance 3cm -
Number of lenses - 143
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fully articulated
Screen diagonal 2.7" 3"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 1,229 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.78x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/8000s
Continuous shutter speed 1.0fps 12.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.80 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Off, auto, fill, slow sync, redeye reduction, rear sync, high-speed sync, wireless
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync - 1/250s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 3840x2160
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 155 gr (0.34 lbs) 849 gr (1.87 lbs)
Dimensions 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") 143 x 104 x 76mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 92
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 25.4
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 13.4
DXO Low light rating not tested 2317
Other
Battery life 150 shots 490 shots
Battery format Battery Pack NP-FM500H lithium-ion battery & charger
Battery ID LI-42B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) Yes (2, 5, 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC/MS Duo slots
Storage slots 1 2
Cost at release $0 $3,198