Olympus TG-320 vs Sony a3500
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
69 Imaging
62 Features
54 Overall
58
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony a3500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 411g - 128 x 91 x 85mm
- Introduced March 2014
- Old Model is Sony A3000
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-320 vs Sony a3500 Overview
Following is a extensive comparison of the Olympus TG-320 versus Sony a3500, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and a3500 (20MP) and the TG-320 (1/2.3") and a3500 (APS-C) posses different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-320 was released 3 years earlier than the a3500 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony a3500 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief summary of how the TG-320 grades versus the a3500 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-320 vs Sony a3500 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-320 and Sony Alpha a3500. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-320 Gallery and Sony a3500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Sony a3500
| TG-320 | a3500 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony a3500 over the Olympus TG-320
| a3500 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2014 | January 2012 | More modern by 26 months | |
| Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Sony a3500
| TG-320 | a3500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | No Touch display |
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony a3500 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-320 offers external measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sony a3500 has proportions of 128mm x 91mm x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") and a weight of 411 grams (0.91 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-320 versus Sony a3500 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at that moment. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the TG-320 versus the a3500.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-320 and a3500 is 94 and 69 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony a3500 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading through specifications. The pic underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-320 and a3500.
Plainly, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The TG-320 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Sony a3500 will resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images more aggressively. The more aged TG-320 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony a3500 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony a3500 Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Sony Alpha a3500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus TG-320 | Sony Alpha a3500 |
| Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2014-03-21 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | BIONZ image |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5456 x 3632 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 16000 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 121 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.47x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | 6.00 m (at ISO200 / 4m at ISO100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Flash off, Auto flash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync. |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155g (0.34 lb) | 411g (0.91 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 128 x 91 x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 photos | 470 photos |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-42B | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2-sec. or 10-sec. delay) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $0 | $398 |