Olympus TG-320 vs Sony H90
Portability
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
Portability
91 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
91 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony H90 Key Specs
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
Sony H90
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 222g - 105 x 60 x 34mm
- Launched February 2012
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus TG-320 vs Sony H90 Overview
Following is a thorough review of the Olympus TG-320 versus Sony H90, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the H90 (16MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-320 was introduced within a month of the H90 which means that they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a short highlight of how the TG-320 grades versus the H90 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-320 vs Sony H90 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-320 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Sony H90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Sony H90
| TG-320 | H90 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony H90 over the Olympus TG-320
| H90 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Sony H90
| TG-320 | H90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | February 2012 | Similar age |
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony H90 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-320 has exterior measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sony H90 has dimensions of 105mm x 60mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-320 versus Sony H90 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the TG-320 vs the H90.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-320 and H90 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony H90 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to envision the difference between sensor sizes simply by checking specs. The pic below may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-320 and H90.
All in all, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Sony H90 to resolve more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony H90 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography info
Sony H90 Portrait photography info
good resolution (14 megapixels)
features face detect focusing
no manual focus
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
good resolution (16MP)
provides face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Street photography details
Sony H90 Street photography details
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
lighter than competitors in class (155g)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (222 grams)
screen is fixed
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Olympus TG-320 as a Sports photography camera
Sony H90 as a Sports photography camera
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14MP)
features tracking focus
weather proof
low frames per second (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery power (150 per charge)
has no phase detect AF
excellent zoom range (24-384mm 16.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
slow fps (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Travel photography info
Sony H90 Travel photography info
lighter than competitors in class (155 grams)
weather proof
good resolution (14MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
bad battery power (150 shots)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
lighter than average in class (222 grams)
good resolution (16MP)
flash built-in
fairly wide (24mm)
great zoom (384mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography features
Sony H90 Landscape photography features
decently wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14MP)
weather proof
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.7")
no manual exposure
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
bad battery power (150 CIPA)
missing Time Lapse mode
fairly wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Vlogging highlights
Sony H90 Vlogging highlights
decently wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect focusing
lighter than competitors in class (155g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing mic port
fairly wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focus
lighter than average in class (222 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
display isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external mic port
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony H90 Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus TG-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-01-10 | 2012-02-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 461k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | ClearPhoto TFT LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | 3.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155g (0.34 lb) | 222g (0.49 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 105 x 60 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 images | 290 images |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-42B | NP-BG1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $230 |
