Clicky

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony HX200V

Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus TG-320 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V front
Portability
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony HX200V Key Specs

Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Announced January 2012
Sony HX200V
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
  • Revealed May 2012
  • Previous Model is Sony HX100V
  • Replacement is Sony HX300
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony HX200V Overview

The following is a thorough comparison of the Olympus TG-320 versus Sony HX200V, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and HX200V (18MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The TG-320 was unveiled 4 months earlier than the HX200V which means that they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a brief overview of how the TG-320 scores against the HX200V with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Sony HX200V

		

		

			
 TG-320 HX200V 
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Olympus TG-320

		

		

			
 HX200V TG-320 
Focus manually  Dial exact focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution922k230kSharper display (+692k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Sony HX200V

		

		

			
 TG-320 HX200V 
RevealedJanuary 2012May 2012Similar age
Selfie screen  Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly display  Neither features Touch friendly display
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison

		

		

			
For those who are looking to travel with your camera, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-320 enjoys external dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sony HX200V has measurements of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-320 versus Sony HX200V in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-320 against the HX200V.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony HX200V size comparison
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and HX200V is 94 and 66 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony HX200V top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Sometimes, it's difficult to envision the difference between sensor dimensions only by going over a spec sheet. The pic below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-320 and HX200V.
As you can see, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Sony HX200V to offer you greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a good deal more aggressively.
	
			Olympus TG-320 vs Sony HX200V sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Olympus TG-320 vs Sony HX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography features
Sony HX200V Portrait photography features
33
 megapixel count good (14MP)
 features face detection focusing
 focusing manually not possible
 lack of manual mode
 external flash not possible
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 has no RAW support
45
 focusing manually
 decent MP (18 megapixels)
 supports face detect autofocus
 can't use external flash
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 has no RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Street Comparison
 Olympus TG-320 as a Street photography camera
 Sony HX200V as a Street photography camera
66
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 weather proof
 lighter than competition in class (155 grams)
 fixed screen
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 has no RAW support
51
 has a tilting screen
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 has no RAW support
 heavier than average in class (583 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Sports Comparison
 Olympus TG-320 as a Sports photography camera
 Sony HX200V as a Sports photography camera
40
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
 features tracking autofocus
 weather proof
 continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames/s)
 lack of shutter priority mode
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 not so great battery (150 CIPA)
 has no phase detect AF
56
 great zoom range (27-810mm  30.0 x zoom)
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 decent MP (18 megapixels)
 supports tracking focus
 good battery (450 shots)
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 has no phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary
Travel Comparison
Travel photography with Olympus TG-320
Travel photography with Sony HX200V
67
 lighter than competition in class (155 grams)
 weather proof
 megapixel count good (14MP)
 flash built-in
 quite wide (28mm)
 doesn't have Timelapse mode
 not so great battery (150 per charge)
 display is not selfie friendly
 slow max aperture (f3.5)
57
 good battery (450 CIPA)
 decent MP (18MP)
 has built in flash
 pretty wide (27mm)
 great reach (810mm)
 does not have Time Lapse function
 heavier than average in class (583 grams)
 doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Landscape Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography highlights
Sony HX200V Landscape photography highlights
39
 quite wide (28mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
 weather proof
 focusing manually not possible
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 slow max aperture (f3.5)
 small screen (2.7 inch)
 lack of manual mode
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 has no RAW support
 not so great battery (150 per charge)
 doesn't have Timelapse mode
50
 focusing manually
 pretty wide (27mm)
 screen is a decent size (3")
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 decent MP (18MP)
 good battery (450 per charge)
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 has no RAW support
 does not have Time Lapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Vlogging features
Sony HX200V Vlogging features
32
 quite wide (28mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 features face detection focusing
 lighter than competition in class (155g)
 slow max aperture (f3.5)
 display is not selfie friendly
 low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
 doesn't have external microphone port
27
 pretty wide (27mm)
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 supports face detect autofocus
 high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
 doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
 does not have mic jack
 heavier than average in class (583 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	

		

			
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony HX200V Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-320 and Sony HX200V
 Olympus TG-320Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus TG-320 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V
Class Waterproof Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2012-01-10 2012-05-11
Body design Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III+ BIONZ
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 18MP
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio - 4:3 and  16:9
Full resolution 4288 x 3216 4896 x 3672
Max native ISO 1600 12800
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW format    
Autofocusing
Manual focusing    
AF touch    
AF continuous    
Single AF    
AF tracking    
AF selectice    
AF center weighted    
Multi area AF    
Live view AF    
Face detection focusing    
Contract detection focusing    
Phase detection focusing    
Total focus points - 9
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-102mm (3.6x) 27-810mm (30.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.1 f/2.8-5.6
Macro focusing range 3cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 922 thousand dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch display    
Screen technology TFT Color LCD XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed 1.0 frames per sec 10.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB    
Image stabilization    
Built-in flash    
Flash distance 5.80 m 12.40 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync
Hot shoe    
AEB    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic input    
Headphone input    
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 155g (0.34 lb) 583g (1.29 lb)
Physical dimensions 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 150 images 450 images
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID LI-42B NP-FH50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse feature    
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots One One
Pricing at launch $0 $480