Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX1
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
79 Imaging
70 Features
57 Overall
64
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0-22.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Announced February 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX1 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Olympus TG-320 versus Sony RX1, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and RX1 (24MP) and the TG-320 (1/2.3") and RX1 (Full frame) come with totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-320 was introduced 13 months before the RX1 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the TG-320 matches up vs the RX1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-320 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-320 Gallery and Sony RX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Sony RX1
| TG-320 | RX1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX1 over the Olympus TG-320
| RX1 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2013 |  | January 2012 | Newer by 13 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1229k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+999k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Sony RX1
| TG-320 | RX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-320 offers outside measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sony RX1 has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") having a weight of 482 grams (1.06 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-320 versus Sony RX1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the TG-320 versus the RX1.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-320 and RX1 is 94 and 79 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to envision the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture below will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-320 and RX1.
As you can see, the two cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The TG-320 using its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Sony RX1 will deliver greater detail using its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged TG-320 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX1 Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 |
| Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2013-02-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 852.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 35mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.0-22.0 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 1,229k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | 6.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/4000 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) | 482 grams (1.06 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 93 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 25.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 14.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 2534 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 shots | 270 shots |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $2,798 |
