Clicky

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony TX200V

Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus TG-320 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V front
Portability
96 Imaging
41 Features
48 Overall
43

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs

Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Announced January 2012
Sony TX200V
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
  • 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony TX200V Overview

Here is a in-depth comparison of the Olympus TG-320 vs Sony TX200V, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and TX200V (18MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The TG-320 was launched at a similar time to the TX200V which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.

Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the TG-320 scores versus the TX200V with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone 

				

					

						
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Sony TX200V

					

					

						
 TG-320 TX200V 
					

				


				

					

						
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Olympus TG-320

					

					

						
 TX200V TG-320 
Display dimension3.3"2.7"Larger display (+0.6")
Display resolution1230k230kSharper display (+1000k dot)
Touch friendly display  Easily navigate
					

				


				

					

						
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Sony TX200V

					

					

						
 TG-320 TX200V 
RevealedJanuary 2012January 2012Similar age
Manual focus  No manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen  Neither contains selfie screen
					

				

				

	
	
	
	

				

					

						
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison

					

					

						
If you're aiming to carry your camera, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-320 has got exterior dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sony TX200V has proportions of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-320 vs Sony TX200V in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the TG-320 compared to the TX200V.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony TX200V size comparison
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and TX200V is 94 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony TX200V top view buttons comparison					

				


				

					

						
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison

					

					

						
Typically, it's tough to see the difference between sensor sizing merely by going over specs. The visual here might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-320 and TX200V.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Sony TX200V to offer you more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos much more aggressively.

						Olympus TG-320 vs Sony TX200V sensor size comparison
					

				


				

					

						
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder

					

					

											

					Olympus TG-320 vs Sony TX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison				


								President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban				

	
	
	
	

				

					
Photography Type Scores

					

				

				
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography factors
Sony TX200V Portrait photography factors
33
 decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
 supports face detect focusing
 manual focus not available
 manual exposure not available
 external flash not possible
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW format
36
 good megapixels (18MP)
 includes face detection focusing
 no manual focus
 no manual control
 can't use external flash
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 no RAW files
Photography Glossary
Street Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Street photography details
Sony TX200V Street photography details
66
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 weather proof
 lighter than competitors in class (155 grams)
 fixed screen
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW format
67
 image stabilization (Optical)
 features focus via touch
 environment sealing
 no moving screen
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 no RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Sports Comparison
Sports photography with Olympus TG-320
Sports photography with Sony TX200V
40
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
 supports tracking focus
 weather proof
 continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames per second)
 lack of shutter priority mode
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 terrible battery pack (150 shots)
 lack of phase detect AF
49
 image stabilization (Optical)
 good megapixels (18 megapixels)
 includes tracking autofocus
 environment sealing
 no shutter priority mode
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 no phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Travel Comparison
 Olympus TG-320 as a Travel photography camera
 Sony TX200V as a Travel photography camera
67
 lighter than competitors in class (155g)
 weather proof
 decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
 flash built-in
 really wide (28mm)
 missing Timelapse function
 terrible battery pack (150 per charge)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
71
 environment sealing
 features focus via touch
 good megapixels (18MP)
 built-in flash
 decently wide (28mm)
 lack of Timelapse function
 display is not selfie friendly
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Landscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-320
Landscape photography with Sony TX200V
39
 really wide (28mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent megapixels (14MP)
 weather proof
 manual focus not available
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 tiny screen (2.7 inch)
 manual exposure not available
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW format
 terrible battery pack (150 CIPA)
 missing Timelapse function
46
 decently wide (28mm)
 screen is a good size (3.3 inch)
 image stabilization (Optical)
 good megapixels (18MP)
 environment sealing
 no manual focus
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
 no manual control
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 no RAW files
 lack of Timelapse function
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Vlogging highlights
Sony TX200V Vlogging highlights
32
 really wide (28mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 supports face detect focusing
 lighter than competitors in class (155 grams)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
 missing microphone jack
35
 decently wide (28mm)
 touch screen
 image stabilization (Optical)
 includes face detection focusing
 good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
 display is not selfie friendly
 lack of external microphone jack
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
				
								
				

					

						
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony TX200V Specifications

					

					

											


					

						Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-320 and Sony TX200V
 Olympus TG-320Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus TG-320 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V
Type Waterproof Ultracompact
Announced 2012-01-10 2012-01-30
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III+ BIONZ
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 18MP
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio - 4:3 and  16:9
Highest resolution 4288 x 3216 4896 x 3672
Highest native ISO 1600 12800
Lowest native ISO 80 64
RAW pictures    
Autofocusing
Manual focusing    
Autofocus touch    
Autofocus continuous    
Single autofocus    
Autofocus tracking    
Selective autofocus    
Center weighted autofocus    
Multi area autofocus    
Autofocus live view    
Face detect autofocus    
Contract detect autofocus    
Phase detect autofocus    
Total focus points - 9
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-102mm (3.6x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.5-5.1 f/3.5-4.8
Macro focusing distance 3cm 3cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7 inches 3.3 inches
Resolution of display 230k dot 1,230k dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch function    
Display tech TFT Color LCD 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 2 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 1.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual exposure    
Set white balance    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash distance 5.80 m 3.10 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
Hot shoe    
Auto exposure bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment metering    
Average metering    
Spot metering    
Partial metering    
AF area metering    
Center weighted metering    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone input    
Headphone input    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 155 grams (0.34 pounds) 129 grams (0.28 pounds)
Dimensions 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 150 photographs 220 photographs
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID LI-42B NP-BN
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse feature    
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots One One
Pricing at launch $0 $500