Olympus TG-320 vs Sony W570
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
96 Imaging
39 Features
25 Overall
33
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony W570 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
- 116g - 91 x 52 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2011
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony W570 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Olympus TG-320 versus Sony W570, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the W570 (16MP) is relatively comparable and they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-320 was manufactured 13 months after the W570 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony W570 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the TG-320 matches up versus the W570 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony W570 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-320 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W570. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-320 Gallery and Sony W570 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Sony W570
TG-320 | W570 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2012 | January 2011 | Newer by 13 months |
Reasons to pick Sony W570 over the Olympus TG-320
W570 | TG-320 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Sony W570
TG-320 | W570 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | 2.7" | Identical screen measurement | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony W570 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-320 features outer measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sony W570 has dimensions of 91mm x 52mm x 19mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-320 versus Sony W570 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-320 against the W570.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-320 and W570 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony W570 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions only by going through technical specs. The picture underneath will give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-320 and W570.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You should count on the Sony W570 to produce greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The more recent TG-320 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony W570 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony W570 Specifications
Olympus TG-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W570 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus TG-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W570 |
Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2011-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.6-6.3 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | Clear Photo LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 2 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m | 3.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 155 gr (0.34 pounds) | 116 gr (0.26 pounds) |
Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 91 x 52 x 19mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-42B | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $0 | $159 |