Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
93 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37


77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 190g - 96 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Released November 2009

Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
The following is a extensive analysis of the Olympus TG-610 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the TG-610 (14MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is very comparable but the TG-610 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) feature different sensor dimensions.

The TG-610 was manufactured 15 months after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro making the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-610 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the TG-610 matches up versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-610 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-610 Gallery and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-610 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
TG-610 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2011 | ![]() | November 2009 | Newer by 15 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus TG-610
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | TG-610 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-610 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
TG-610 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 920k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Absent Touch display |
Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-610 offers exterior measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has sizing of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-610 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the TG-610 vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-610 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 93 and 77 respectively.

Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions purely by going through specifications. The pic below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-610 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
To sum up, the two cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The TG-610 because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Olympus TG-610 will show more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images far more aggressively. The fresher TG-610 should have an advantage in sensor tech.

Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Olympus TG-610 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus TG-610 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Category | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2011-01-06 | 2009-11-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 920k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 180 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.20 m | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) | 453 grams (1.00 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 shots | 320 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $223 | $566 |