Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
91 Imaging
32 Features
25 Overall
29
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 229g - 103 x 60 x 33mm
- Announced May 2009
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ6
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1 Overview
The following is a in-depth assessment of the Olympus TG-630 iHS versus Panasonic ZS1, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the TG-630 iHS (12MP) and the ZS1 (10MP) is very similar but the TG-630 iHS (1/2.3") and ZS1 (1/2.5") posses totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-630 iHS was brought out 3 years after the ZS1 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a simple summation of how the TG-630 iHS scores against the ZS1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-630 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery & Panasonic ZS1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Panasonic ZS1
| TG-630 iHS | ZS1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 | May 2009 | Newer by 45 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS1 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| ZS1 | TG-630 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Panasonic ZS1
| TG-630 iHS | ZS1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-630 iHS comes with exterior measurements of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS1 has sizing of 103mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 229 grams (0.50 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-630 iHS versus Panasonic ZS1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the TG-630 iHS against the ZS1.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-630 iHS and ZS1 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to envision the gap between sensor dimensions simply by going over specifications. The pic below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-630 iHS and ZS1.
To sum up, both the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The TG-630 iHS featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus TG-630 iHS will deliver extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The fresher TG-630 iHS is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1 Specifications
| Olympus TG-630 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus TG-630 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 |
| Also called | - | Lumix DMC-TZ6 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-01-08 | 2009-05-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.3-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.30 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 167g (0.37 lb) | 229g (0.50 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 103 x 60 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $200 | $0 |