Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
91 Imaging
32 Features
25 Overall
29
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 229g - 103 x 60 x 33mm
- Announced May 2009
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ6
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1 Overview
The following is a in-depth assessment of the Olympus TG-630 iHS versus Panasonic ZS1, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the TG-630 iHS (12MP) and the ZS1 (10MP) is very similar but the TG-630 iHS (1/2.3") and ZS1 (1/2.5") posses totally different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-630 iHS was brought out 3 years after the ZS1 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a simple summation of how the TG-630 iHS scores against the ZS1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-630 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery & Panasonic ZS1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Panasonic ZS1
| TG-630 iHS | ZS1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 | May 2009 | Newer by 45 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS1 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| ZS1 | TG-630 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Panasonic ZS1
| TG-630 iHS | ZS1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-630 iHS comes with exterior measurements of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS1 has sizing of 103mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 229 grams (0.50 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-630 iHS versus Panasonic ZS1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the TG-630 iHS against the ZS1.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-630 iHS and ZS1 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to envision the gap between sensor dimensions simply by going over specifications. The pic below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-630 iHS and ZS1.
To sum up, both the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The TG-630 iHS featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus TG-630 iHS will deliver extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The fresher TG-630 iHS is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic ZS1 Specifications
| Olympus TG-630 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus TG-630 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 |
| Also called | - | Lumix DMC-TZ6 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-01-08 | 2009-05-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.3-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.30 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 167g (0.37 lb) | 229g (0.50 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 103 x 60 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $200 | $0 |