Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh CX3
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched June 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
Below is a extensive analysis of the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Ricoh CX3, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the TG-630 iHS (12MP) and the CX3 (10MP) is relatively similar and they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-630 iHS was manufactured 2 years later than the CX3 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summary of how the TG-630 iHS grades versus the CX3 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-630 iHS & Ricoh CX3. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery & Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Ricoh CX3
| TG-630 iHS | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | June 2010 | More recent by 32 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| CX3 | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Ricoh CX3
| TG-630 iHS | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither offers Touch screen |
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-630 iHS offers outside dimensions of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Ricoh CX3 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Ricoh CX3 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the TG-630 iHS versus the CX3.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the TG-630 iHS and CX3 is 94 and 92 respectively.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to imagine the difference between sensor measurements merely by reviewing specifications. The graphic underneath might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-630 iHS and CX3.
Plainly, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can count on the Olympus TG-630 iHS to deliver greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The more modern TG-630 iHS should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
| Olympus TG-630 iHS | Ricoh CX3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus TG-630 iHS | Ricoh CX3 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-01-08 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 167g (0.37 pounds) | 206g (0.45 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $200 | $329 |
