Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung NX30
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41c7c/41c7c096f5b120d51cec7dfdff2b001e8780d88f" alt="Olympus TG-630 iHS front Olympus TG-630 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce26f/ce26f126ddb897ecf80630f38a706a60c1b9d696" alt="Samsung NX30 front Samsung NX30 front"
75 Imaging
63 Features
85 Overall
71
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung NX30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 375g - 127 x 96 x 58mm
- Revealed January 2014
- Superseded the Samsung NX20
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung NX30 Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Samsung NX30, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the TG-630 iHS (12MP) and NX30 (20MP) and the TG-630 iHS (1/2.3") and NX30 (APS-C) have totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The TG-630 iHS was introduced 12 months earlier than the NX30 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-630 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX30 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a quick summary of how the TG-630 iHS matches up vs the NX30 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung NX30 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-630 iHS & Samsung NX30. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery & Samsung NX30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Samsung NX30
TG-630 iHS | NX30 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX30 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
NX30 | TG-630 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | ![]() | January 2013 | Fresher by 12 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1036k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+576k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Samsung NX30
TG-630 iHS | NX30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen size |
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung NX30 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-630 iHS provides exterior dimensions of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Samsung NX30 has proportions of 127mm x 96mm x 58mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.3") having a weight of 375 grams (0.83 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Samsung NX30 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-630 iHS vs the NX30.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50ff2/50ff2c1f2d239fb2f7d2120c43f4a5cfc115678d" alt="Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung NX30 size comparison Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung NX30 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-630 iHS and NX30 is 94 and 75 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37c2a/37c2a308111e3816b9d3c23dd44d7ca4cd2231cb" alt="Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung NX30 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung NX30 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung NX30 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizing simply by viewing specs. The photograph here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-630 iHS and NX30.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The TG-630 iHS having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Samsung NX30 will render extra detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The older TG-630 iHS will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f7a3/7f7a3388a785e84afe8148383fcb6694f0f372b1" alt="Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung NX30 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung NX30 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung NX30 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44901/4490151d24451018ee5a55ab58ef0d3201d2d389" alt="Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung NX30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung NX30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung NX30 Specifications
Olympus TG-630 iHS | Samsung NX30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus TG-630 iHS | Samsung NX30 |
Class | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2013-01-08 | 2014-01-03 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | DRIMeIV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 247 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 1,036 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.66x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per second | 9.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 167 gr (0.37 lb) | 375 gr (0.83 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 127 x 96 x 58mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 77 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1014 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 shots | 360 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | BP1410 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 - 30 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $200 | $699 |