Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung NX300
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35


86 Imaging
62 Features
73 Overall
66
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Released November 2013
- Superseded the Samsung NX210
- Refreshed by Samsung NX500

Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Overview
Following is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Samsung NX300, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the TG-630 iHS (12MP) and NX300 (20MP) and the TG-630 iHS (1/2.3") and NX300 (APS-C) come with different sensor sizes.

The TG-630 iHS was launched 10 months before the NX300 and they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-630 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a short summation of how the TG-630 iHS grades vs the NX300 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-630 iHS and Samsung NX300. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery and Samsung NX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Samsung NX300
TG-630 iHS | NX300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
NX300 | TG-630 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | November 2013 | ![]() | January 2013 | More modern by 10 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display sizing | 3.3" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 768k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+308k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Samsung NX300
TG-630 iHS | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Olympus TG-630 iHS has got exterior dimensions of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Samsung NX300 has specifications of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") with a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Samsung NX300 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-630 iHS versus the NX300.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the TG-630 iHS and NX300 is 94 and 86 respectively.

Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizes only by looking at a spec sheet. The picture underneath may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-630 iHS and NX300.
As you can see, both of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The TG-630 iHS featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh tougher and the Samsung NX300 will give more detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged TG-630 iHS is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Specifications
Olympus TG-630 iHS | Samsung NX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus TG-630 iHS | Samsung NX300 |
Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2013-01-08 | 2013-11-24 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 247 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 3.3" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 768 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per second | 9.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 167g (0.37 pounds) | 331g (0.73 pounds) |
Dimensions | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 76 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 942 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photos | 330 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $200 | $750 |