Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung PL210
94 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
99 Imaging
36 Features
19 Overall
29
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung PL210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung PL210 Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Samsung PL210, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the TG-630 iHS (12MP) and the PL210 (14MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TG-630 iHS was announced 2 years after the PL210 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-630 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung PL210 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short overview of how the TG-630 iHS grades vs the PL210 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung PL210 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-630 iHS & Samsung PL210. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery & Samsung PL210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Samsung PL210
| TG-630 iHS | PL210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 25 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL210 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| PL210 | TG-630 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Samsung PL210
| TG-630 iHS | PL210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung PL210 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-630 iHS has outside dimensions of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Samsung PL210 has proportions of 100mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Samsung PL210 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the TG-630 iHS against the PL210.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-630 iHS and PL210 is 94 and 99 respectively.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung PL210 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions purely by going through specifications. The image underneath may give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-630 iHS and PL210.
To sum up, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Samsung PL210 to provide more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The newer TG-630 iHS should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung PL210 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung PL210 Specifications
| Olympus TG-630 iHS | Samsung PL210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus TG-630 iHS | Samsung PL210 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2013-01-08 | 2011-01-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | () |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 167 gr (0.37 pounds) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 100 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photographs | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $200 | $200 |