Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung WB800F
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung WB800F Overview
In this write-up, we will be comparing the Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung WB800F, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the TG-630 iHS (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-630 iHS was revealed within a month of the WB800F and they are of a similar generation. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a concise overview of how the TG-630 iHS matches up versus the WB800F for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-630 iHS and Samsung WB800F. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Samsung WB800F
| TG-630 iHS | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| WB800F | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Samsung WB800F
| TG-630 iHS | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | January 2013 | Similar generation |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Olympus TG-630 iHS features physical dimensions of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung WB800F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the TG-630 iHS versus the WB800F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-630 iHS and WB800F is 94 and 92 respectively.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading through specs. The pic underneath should give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-630 iHS and WB800F.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Samsung WB800F to give greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures far more aggressively.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Olympus TG-630 iHS | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus TG-630 iHS | Samsung WB800F |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2013-01-08 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 460k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 167 gr (0.37 lb) | 218 gr (0.48 lb) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photographs | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $200 | $300 |