Olympus TG-810 vs Samsung NX3000
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33564/33564fa180a03f0ad37d4e2877201fb0d473cbdb" alt="Olympus TG-810 front Olympus TG-810 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de65b/de65bfe186e39934ff695656a2380e8b4549eaed" alt="Samsung NX3000 front Samsung NX3000 front"
89 Imaging
63 Features
62 Overall
62
Olympus TG-810 vs Samsung NX3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 230g - 117 x 66 x 39mm
- Released May 2014
- Succeeded the Samsung NX2000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-810 vs Samsung NX3000 Overview
Below is a extended overview of the Olympus TG-810 and Samsung NX3000, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap among the resolutions of the TG-810 (14MP) and NX3000 (20MP) and the TG-810 (1/2.3") and NX3000 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The TG-810 was manufactured 3 years before the NX3000 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-810 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX3000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a concise view of how the TG-810 grades against the NX3000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus TG-810 vs Samsung NX3000 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-810 and Samsung NX3000. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-810 Gallery and Samsung NX3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-810 over the Samsung NX3000
TG-810 | NX3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 461k | Crisper display (+459k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX3000 over the Olympus TG-810
NX3000 | TG-810 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2014 | ![]() | August 2011 | More recent by 33 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Olympus TG-810 and Samsung NX3000
TG-810 | NX3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-810 vs Samsung NX3000 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-810 enjoys external dimensions of 100mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Samsung NX3000 has dimensions of 117mm x 66mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-810 and Samsung NX3000 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the TG-810 vs the NX3000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6cf5/e6cf52d3ef4006f45cae9ceb743d667be0c0d1ac" alt="Olympus TG-810 vs Samsung NX3000 size comparison Olympus TG-810 vs Samsung NX3000 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-810 and NX3000 is 92 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd6ef/bd6efac71ece80e45e27e3358a4a4bd5469e6353" alt="Olympus TG-810 vs Samsung NX3000 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-810 vs Samsung NX3000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-810 vs Samsung NX3000 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements simply by seeing specs. The visual here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-810 and NX3000.
All in all, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The TG-810 due to its smaller sensor will make getting bokeh trickier and the Samsung NX3000 will show greater detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics way more aggressively. The older TG-810 will be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4748e/4748e4fc659770f30cea6ba2088427e9ecd47ec6" alt="Olympus TG-810 vs Samsung NX3000 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-810 vs Samsung NX3000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-810 vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47909/47909acd3370821efd9eaca8b3c7a4fc9f94cbfa" alt="Olympus TG-810 vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-810 vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus TG-810 vs Samsung NX3000 Specifications
Olympus TG-810 | Samsung NX3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus TG-810 | Samsung NX3000 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2011-08-16 | 2014-05-26 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Cross focus points | - | 1 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 461 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.20 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 215g (0.47 lb) | 230g (0.51 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 117 x 66 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 pictures | 370 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | B740 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2-30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $428 | $897 |