Olympus TG-810 vs Samsung WB800F
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Olympus TG-810 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched August 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Olympus TG-810 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
The following is a extensive comparison of the Olympus TG-810 and Samsung WB800F, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the TG-810 (14MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is very well matched and they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-810 was launched 17 months before the WB800F making the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the TG-810 scores vs the WB800F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-810 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-810 & Samsung WB800F. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-810 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-810 over the Samsung WB800F
TG-810 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Olympus TG-810
WB800F | TG-810 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | August 2011 | Newer by 17 months | |
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-810 and Samsung WB800F
TG-810 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus TG-810 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera often, you have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus TG-810 features physical measurements of 100mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-810 and Samsung WB800F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at the time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-810 compared to the WB800F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-810 and WB800F is 92 and 92 respectively.
Olympus TG-810 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions purely by looking at specifications. The pic here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-810 and WB800F.
To sum up, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can expect to see the Samsung WB800F to give you more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged TG-810 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-810 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-810 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
Olympus TG-810 | Samsung WB800F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus TG-810 | Samsung WB800F |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2011-08-16 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 920k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.20 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 215 gr (0.47 lbs) | 218 gr (0.48 lbs) |
Dimensions | 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $428 | $300 |