Olympus TG-810 vs Sigma SD10
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Olympus TG-810 vs Sigma SD10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800 (Raise to 1600)
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Launched March 2004
- Old Model is Sigma SD9
- Successor is Sigma SD14
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-810 vs Sigma SD10 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Olympus TG-810 vs Sigma SD10, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Olympus and Sigma. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the TG-810 (14MP) and SD10 (3MP) and the TG-810 (1/2.3") and SD10 (APS-C) possess different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-810 was launched 7 years after the SD10 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-810 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick overview of how the TG-810 matches up against the SD10 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-810 vs Sigma SD10 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-810 & Sigma SD10. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-810 Gallery & Sigma SD10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-810 over the Sigma SD10
| TG-810 | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2011 |  | March 2004 | More modern by 91 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 130k | Crisper display (+790k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD10 over the Olympus TG-810
| SD10 | TG-810 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-810 and Sigma SD10
| TG-810 | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus TG-810 vs Sigma SD10 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera, you need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus TG-810 has got physical dimensions of 100mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD10 has specifications of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-810 vs Sigma SD10 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at the time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-810 vs the SD10.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the TG-810 and SD10 is 92 and 54 respectively.
Olympus TG-810 vs Sigma SD10 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizes just by researching technical specs. The picture below will give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-810 and SD10.
As you can tell, both cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The TG-810 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Olympus TG-810 will result in greater detail utilizing its extra 11 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos far more aggressively. The fresher TG-810 should have an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-810 vs Sigma SD10 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus TG-810 vs Sigma SD10 Specifications
| Olympus TG-810 | Sigma SD10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model | Olympus TG-810 | Sigma SD10 |
| Type | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Announced | 2011-08-16 | 2004-03-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 3 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 1.8 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 130 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/6000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.20 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 215g (0.47 lbs) | 950g (2.09 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $428 | $198 |