Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FH1
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FH1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 163g - 98 x 55 x 23mm
- Announced January 2010
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FS10
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FH1 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Panasonic FH1, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the FH1 (12MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe TG-820 iHS was revealed 2 years after the FH1 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the TG-820 iHS matches up against the FH1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FH1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Panasonic FH1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Panasonic FH1
| TG-820 iHS | FH1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2012 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 26 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1030k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+800k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH1 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| FH1 | TG-820 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Panasonic FH1
| TG-820 iHS | FH1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FH1 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-820 iHS comes with exterior dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FH1 has sizing of 98mm x 55mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 163 grams (0.36 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Panasonic FH1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-820 iHS vs the FH1.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the TG-820 iHS and FH1 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FH1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes just by checking specifications. The pic underneath may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-820 iHS and FH1.
To sum up, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the exact same megapixels therefore you can expect similar quality of photos although you have to consider the age of the products into consideration. The newer TG-820 iHS provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FH1 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FH1 Specifications
| Olympus TG-820 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 |
| Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FS10 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-02-08 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-6.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 1,030k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per second | 6.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 6.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) | 163 grams (0.36 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 98 x 55 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $500 | $150 |