Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FZ300
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
59 Imaging
37 Features
73 Overall
51
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FZ300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/16000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 691g - 132 x 92 x 117mm
- Announced July 2015
- Superseded the Panasonic FZ200
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FZ300 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Panasonic FZ300, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the FZ300 (12MP) is relatively close and both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-820 iHS was introduced 4 years prior to the FZ300 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the TG-820 iHS scores vs the FZ300 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FZ300 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Panasonic FZ300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Panasonic FZ300
| TG-820 iHS | FZ300 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ300 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| FZ300 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2015 | February 2012 | More modern by 41 months | |
| Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 1030k | Sharper screen (+10k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Panasonic FZ300
| TG-820 iHS | FZ300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FZ300 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-820 iHS has got physical measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ300 has sizing of 132mm x 92mm x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") and a weight of 691 grams (1.52 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Panasonic FZ300 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-820 iHS against the FZ300.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-820 iHS and FZ300 is 92 and 59 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FZ300 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizes simply by looking through specs. The image underneath will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-820 iHS and FZ300.
All in all, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size and the identical MP so you can expect comparable quality of pictures but you may want to consider the age of the cameras into account. The more aged TG-820 iHS will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic FZ300 Specifications
| Olympus TG-820 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-02-08 | 2015-07-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VI | Venus Engine |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 49 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 1,030 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/16000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per second | 12.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 8.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206 gr (0.45 lbs) | 691 gr (1.52 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 132 x 92 x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 images | 380 images |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $500 | $598 |