Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh CX4
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched August 2010
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
The following is a extensive review of the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Ricoh CX4, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the CX4 (10MP) is very well matched and both cameras posses the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-820 iHS was launched 18 months after the CX4 making them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple summation of how the TG-820 iHS grades vs the CX4 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh CX4. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Ricoh CX4
TG-820 iHS | CX4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2012 | August 2010 | Newer by 18 months | |
Display resolution | 1030k | 920k | Clearer display (+110k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
CX4 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh CX4
TG-820 iHS | CX4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-820 iHS comes with physical dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Ricoh CX4 has proportions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Ricoh CX4 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-820 iHS against the CX4.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-820 iHS and CX4 is 92 and 92 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions just by checking specs. The picture underneath should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-820 iHS and CX4.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You should expect to see the Olympus TG-820 iHS to resolve more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The more modern TG-820 iHS should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Ricoh CX4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Ricoh CX4 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2012-02-08 | 2010-08-19 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,030 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 206g (0.45 pounds) | 205g (0.45 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-50B | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $500 | $211 |