Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36


92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Released July 2009
- Renewed by Ricoh GR Digital IV

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh GR Digital III, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the GR Digital III (10MP) is relatively close but the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") use totally different sensor dimensions.

The TG-820 iHS was introduced 2 years after the GR Digital III which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a concise overview of how the TG-820 iHS matches up vs the GR Digital III with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Ricoh GR Digital III. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Ricoh GR Digital III
TG-820 iHS | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 31 months |
Screen resolution | 1030k | ![]() | 920k | Clearer screen (+110k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
GR Digital III | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh GR Digital III
TG-820 iHS | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus TG-820 iHS enjoys outside measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital III has specifications of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh GR Digital III in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the TG-820 iHS against the GR Digital III.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the TG-820 iHS and GR Digital III is 92 and 92 respectively.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to see the difference in sensor sizes just by looking through specifications. The image here might give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-820 iHS and GR Digital III.
To sum up, both cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TG-820 iHS having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Olympus TG-820 iHS will render more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The younger TG-820 iHS is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-02-08 | 2009-07-27 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VI | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,030k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lb) | 208 grams (0.46 lb) |
Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $500 | $399 |