Clicky

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III

Portability
92
Imaging
36
Features
37
Overall
36
Olympus TG-820 iHS front
 
Ricoh GR Digital III front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs

Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
  • Launched February 2012
Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Released July 2009
  • Renewed by Ricoh GR Digital IV
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview

Below, we will be contrasting the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh GR Digital III, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the GR Digital III (10MP) is relatively close but the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") use totally different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The TG-820 iHS was introduced 2 years after the GR Digital III which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a concise overview of how the TG-820 iHS matches up vs the GR Digital III with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Ricoh GR Digital III

 TG-820 iHS GR Digital III 
ReleasedFebruary 2012July 2009More modern by 31 months
Screen resolution1030k920kClearer screen (+110k dot)

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Olympus TG-820 iHS

 GR Digital III TG-820 iHS 
Manually focus Dial accurate focus

Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh GR Digital III

 TG-820 iHS GR Digital III 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen sizing
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch screen Absent Touch screen

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus TG-820 iHS enjoys outside measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital III has specifications of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).

Check out the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh GR Digital III in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the TG-820 iHS against the GR Digital III.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the TG-820 iHS and GR Digital III is 92 and 92 respectively.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very hard to see the difference in sensor sizes just by looking through specifications. The image here might give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-820 iHS and GR Digital III.

To sum up, both cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TG-820 iHS having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Olympus TG-820 iHS will render more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The younger TG-820 iHS is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS Portrait photography details
Ricoh GR Digital III Portrait photography details
27
offers face detection focus
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
40
focusing manually
exports RAW files
MP count low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Street photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital III as a Street photography camera
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
no moving screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
55
exports RAW files
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
Sports photography with Ricoh GR Digital III
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers tracking autofocus
weather proofing
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
bad battery power (220 shots)
lack of phase detect auto focus
17
focal length is fixed (28mm)
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
has no phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
Travel photography with Ricoh GR Digital III
59
weather proofing
has built in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse function
bad battery power (220 shots)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
63
built-in flash
very good maximum aperture (f1.9)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS Landscape photography factors
Ricoh GR Digital III Landscape photography factors
38
relatively wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
lack of manual exposure
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
bad battery power (220 shots)
no Time Lapse function
45
focusing manually
very good maximum aperture (f1.9)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
exports RAW files
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS Vlogging advice
Ricoh GR Digital III Vlogging advice
33
relatively wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
display is not selfie friendly
no external mic jack
25
very good maximum aperture (f1.9)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have microphone port
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh GR Digital III
 Olympus TG-820 iHSRicoh GR Digital III
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus TG-820 iHS Ricoh GR Digital III
Class Waterproof Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2012-02-08 2009-07-27
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VI GR engine III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 3968 x 2976 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 6400 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 64
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 28mm (1x)
Largest aperture f/3.9-5.9 f/1.9
Macro focus range 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 1,030k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 1 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 5.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.50 m 3.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 206 grams (0.45 lb) 208 grams (0.46 lb)
Dimensions 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 220 photographs -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery model LI-50B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $500 $399