Clicky

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV

Portability
92
Imaging
36
Features
37
Overall
36
Olympus TG-820 iHS front
 
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs

Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
  • Released February 2012
Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Revealed September 2011
  • Succeeded the Ricoh GR Digital III
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview

In this write-up, we are looking at the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Ricoh GR Digital IV, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is very well matched but the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") come with different sensor dimensions.

Photography Glossary

The TG-820 iHS was announced 5 months later than the GR Digital IV so they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving through a full comparison, below is a concise summary of how the TG-820 iHS grades against the GR Digital IV in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 TG-820 iHS GR Digital IV 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus TG-820 iHS

 GR Digital IV TG-820 iHS 
Manual focus Dial accurate focus
Display resolution1230k1030kClearer display (+200k dot)

Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh GR Digital IV

 TG-820 iHS GR Digital IV 
RevealedFebruary 2012September 2011Similar age
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display sizing
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither has Touch friendly display

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison

If you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-820 iHS has outside measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital IV has sizing of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Ricoh GR Digital IV in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the TG-820 iHS compared to the GR Digital IV.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-820 iHS and GR Digital IV is 92 and 92 respectively.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizing just by reading through specs. The visual underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-820 iHS and GR Digital IV.

All in all, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-820 iHS with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Olympus TG-820 iHS will give you extra detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos far more aggressively.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS Portrait photography highlights
Ricoh GR Digital IV Portrait photography highlights
27
offers face detect focusing
no manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
41
has manual focus
delivers RAW files
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Street photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Street photography camera
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
screen is fixed
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Sports photography camera
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers tracking focus
environment sealing
low frames per second (5.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (220 CIPA)
lacks phase detect AF
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
great battery life (390 shots)
can't change focal length (28mm)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
no phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Travel photography camera
59
environment sealing
flash built-in
decently wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
bad battery pack (220 shots)
low MP (12 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
67
great battery life (390 per charge)
built-in flash
fast maximum aperture (f1.9)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
Landscape photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
38
decently wide (28mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
no manual control
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
bad battery pack (220 per charge)
lack of Time Lapse function
53
has manual focus
fast maximum aperture (f1.9)
screen is a good size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
great battery life (390 shots)
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Vlogging camera
33
decently wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
does not have a selfie friendly display
lack of mic support
29
fast maximum aperture (f1.9)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
display isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have external mic socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh GR Digital IV
 Olympus TG-820 iHSRicoh GR Digital IV
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus TG-820 iHS Ricoh GR Digital IV
Type Waterproof Small Sensor Compact
Released 2012-02-08 2011-09-15
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VI -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Max resolution 3968 x 2976 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 28mm (1x)
Highest aperture f/3.9-5.9 f/1.9
Macro focus distance 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 1,030k dots 1,230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display technology HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs 1 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 5.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.50 m 3.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 206g (0.45 pounds) 190g (0.42 pounds)
Dimensions 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 220 pictures 390 pictures
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LI-50B DB65
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Cost at release $500 $599