Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GR III
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35


90 Imaging
68 Features
62 Overall
65
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Released February 2012
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Released September 2018
- Replaced the Ricoh GR III
- New Model is Ricoh GR III

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GR III Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Ricoh GR III, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and GR III (24MP) and the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and GR III (APS-C) offer different sensor dimensions.

The TG-820 iHS was introduced 7 years prior to the GR III and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the TG-820 iHS scores vs the GR III in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GR III Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh GR III. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Ricoh GR III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Ricoh GR III
TG-820 iHS | GR III |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
GR III | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2018 | ![]() | February 2012 | Fresher by 80 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 1030k | Clearer display (+7k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh GR III
TG-820 iHS | GR III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-820 iHS offers external measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Ricoh GR III has dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Ricoh GR III in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-820 iHS and the GR III.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-820 iHS and GR III is 92 and 90 respectively.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing just by reading through specifications. The visual here may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-820 iHS and GR III.
To sum up, both cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The TG-820 iHS having a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF tougher and the Ricoh GR III will give you more detail using its extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos more aggressively. The older TG-820 iHS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GR III Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Ricoh GR III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Ricoh GR III |
Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2012-02-08 | 2018-09-25 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 102400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-16 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 6cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,030 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 206g (0.45 pounds) | 257g (0.57 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photographs | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $500 | $900 |