Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Released November 2009
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is relatively comparable but the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-820 iHS was released 2 years after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a full comparison, here is a quick summary of how the TG-820 iHS grades against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
TG-820 iHS | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | November 2009 | More modern by 28 months | |
Screen resolution | 1030k | 920k | Sharper screen (+110k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
TG-820 iHS | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-820 iHS features outer measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-820 iHS against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the TG-820 iHS and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 92 and 77 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to envision the gap in sensor sizes just by checking out a spec sheet. The pic below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-820 iHS and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Clearly, the 2 cameras come with the identical MP albeit not the same sensor sizes. The TG-820 iHS includes the smaller sensor which will make achieving shallower depth of field tougher. The more modern TG-820 iHS is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Category | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2012-02-08 | 2009-11-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VI | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 2848 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,030 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 180 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/3200 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 206 grams (0.45 pounds) | 453 grams (1.00 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 pictures | 320 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $500 | $566 |