Clicky

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

Portability
92
Imaging
36
Features
37
Overall
36
Olympus TG-820 iHS front
 
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front
Portability
77
Imaging
52
Features
31
Overall
43

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs

Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
  • Revealed February 2012
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 50mm (F2.5) lens
  • 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
  • Released November 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview

Here, we will be comparing the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is relatively comparable but the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizes.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The TG-820 iHS was released 2 years after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going into a full comparison, here is a quick summary of how the TG-820 iHS grades against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 TG-820 iHS GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
ReleasedFebruary 2012November 2009More modern by 28 months
Screen resolution1030k920kSharper screen (+110k dot)

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus TG-820 iHS

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro TG-820 iHS 
Focus manually Dial exact focusing

Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 TG-820 iHS GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen dimensions
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison

When you are planning to carry around your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-820 iHS features outer measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).

Examine the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-820 iHS against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the TG-820 iHS and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 92 and 77 respectively.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's hard to envision the gap in sensor sizes just by checking out a spec sheet. The pic below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-820 iHS and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Clearly, the 2 cameras come with the identical MP albeit not the same sensor sizes. The TG-820 iHS includes the smaller sensor which will make achieving shallower depth of field tougher. The more modern TG-820 iHS is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS Portrait photography info
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Portrait photography info
27
features face detection focusing
no manual focus
manual mode not available
no external flash support
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
55
manual focus
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
no liveview
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
Street photography with Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
no moving screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
62
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS Sports photography factors
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sports photography factors
34
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features tracking autofocus
environment proofing
painfully slow continuous shooting (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
not so great battery pack (220 shots)
doesn't have phase detect AF
32
sensor size is good (APS-C)
can't change focal length (50mm)
no liveview
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
not so great battery (320 CIPA)
lack of phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro as a Travel photography camera
59
environment proofing
built-in flash
quite wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
not so great battery pack (220 per charge)
resolution not great (12MP)
does not contain selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
49
has built in flash
not so great battery (320 shots)
low megapixels (12MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
Landscape photography with Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
38
quite wide (28mm)
screen is a good size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
manual mode not available
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
not so great battery pack (220 CIPA)
missing Time Lapse recording
46
manual focus
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (50mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
no liveview
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
not so great battery (320 per charge)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS Vlogging factors
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Vlogging factors
33
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
does not contain selfie friendly display
missing external mic jack
20
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external microphone support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
 Olympus TG-820 iHSRicoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus TG-820 iHS Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Category Waterproof Advanced Mirrorless
Revealed 2012-02-08 2009-11-10
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VI GR engine III
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3968 x 2976 4288 x 2848
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 50mm (1x)
Max aperture f/3.9-5.9 f/2.5
Macro focusing distance 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 1,030 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen tech HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 180 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/3200 secs
Continuous shooting rate 5.0 frames per second 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.50 m 3.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 206 grams (0.45 pounds) 453 grams (1.00 pounds)
Physical dimensions 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 220 pictures 320 pictures
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID LI-50B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Launch pricing $500 $566